Attention in Bilingual Children With Developmental Language Disorder

被引:40
作者
Ebert, Kerry Danahy [1 ]
Rak, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Slawny, Caitlyn M. [1 ]
Fogg, Louis [3 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Dept Commun Disorders & Sci, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Linguist, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Rush Univ, Dept Community Syst & Mental Hlth Nursing, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2019年 / 62卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; AUDITORY ATTENTION; WORKING-MEMORY; ADVANTAGES; IMPAIRMENT; SYSTEM; SPEED; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0221
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Attention and language are hypothesized to interact in bilingual children and in children with developmental language disorder (DLD). In children who are bilingual, attentional control may be enhanced by repeated experience regulating 2 languages. In children with DLD, subtle weaknesses in sustained attention may relate to impaired language processing. This study measured attentional control and sustained attention in monolingual and bilingual children with and without DLD in order to examine the potential influences of bilingualism and DLD, as well as their intersection, on attention. Method: Monolingual English-only and bilingual Spanish- English children aged 6-8 years were categorized into participant groups based on eligibility testing and parent interviews. Parent interviews included standardized assessment of language environment and parent concern regarding language. Participants completed 2 nonlinguistic computerized assessments: a flanker task to measure attentional control and a continuous performance task to measure sustained attention. Results: One hundred nine children met all eligibility criteria for inclusion in a participant group. Regression models predicting performance on the attention tasks were similar for both sustained attention and attentional control. For both tasks, DLD was a significant predictor, and bilingualism was not. Measuring bilingualism continuously using parent-reported exposure did not alter results. Conclusions: This study found no evidence of a "bilingual cognitive advantage" on 2 types of attention among sequential Spanish-English bilingual children but also found a negative effect of DLD that was consistent across both types of attention and both bilingual and monolingual children. Results are consistent with the broader literature on subtle nonlinguistic deficits in children with DLD and suggest these deficits are minimally affected by diverse linguistic experience.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 992
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive Correlates of Bilingualism [J].
Adesope, Olusola O. ;
Lavin, Tracy ;
Thompson, Terri ;
Ungerleider, Charles .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 80 (02) :207-245
[2]  
American Academy of Pediatrics & National Initiative for Children's Healthcare Quality, 2002, VAND ASS SCAL
[3]  
American Academy of Pediatrics & University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2005, VAND ASS SCAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, TOUCHDOWNS WINESPEAK
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Guidelines for Audiologic Screening
[6]  
Anton Eneko, 2014, Front Psychol, V5, P398, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00398
[7]   Do Bilingual Children Have an Executive Function Advantage? Results From Inhibition, Shifting, and Updating Tasks [J].
Arizmendi, Genesis D. ;
Alt, Mary ;
Gray, Shelley ;
Hogan, Tiffany P. ;
Green, Samuel ;
Cowan, Nelson .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2018, 49 (03) :356-378
[8]   Behavioral and Electrophysiological Differences in Executive Control Between Monolingual and Bilingual Children [J].
Barac, Raluca ;
Moreno, Sylvain ;
Bialystok, Ellen .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 87 (04) :1277-1290
[9]  
Bialystok E., 2018, Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields, P283, DOI [10.1075/sibil.54.13bia, DOI 10.1075/SIBIL.54.13BIA]
[10]   Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent [J].
Bialystok, Ellen .
BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2009, 12 (01) :3-11