Moral Obligation, Self-Interest and the Transitivity Problem

被引:11
作者
Archer, Alfred [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
SUPEREROGATION;
D O I
10.1017/S0953820816000091
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Is the relation is a morally permissible alternative to' transitive? The answer seems to be a straightforward yes. If Act B is a morally permissible alternative to Act A and Act C is a morally permissible alternative to B then how could C fail to be a morally permissible alternative to A? However, there are cases where this transitivity appears problematic. My aim in this article is to provide a solution to this problem. I will then investigate two ways in which we might justify rejecting the transitivity of the is a permissible alternative to' relation. Next, I will look at Dorsey's solution, which involves a reinterpretation of the intuitions used to generate the problem. I will argue that none of these solutions are fully satisfying, before going on to provide a novel solution to the problem and to argue that it avoids the problems facing the alternative solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 464
页数:24
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MORAL REASONS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, LIMITS MORAL AUTHORI
[3]   Supererogation, Sacrifice, and the Limits of Duty [J].
Archer, Alfred .
SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2016, 54 (03) :333-354
[4]   Supererogation and Intentions of the Agent [J].
Archer, Alfred .
PHILOSOPHIA, 2013, 41 (02) :447-462
[5]  
Archer Alfred, UTILITAS FORTHCOMING
[6]   Normative requirements (Rationality, correct reasoning) [J].
Broome, J .
RATIO-NEW SERIES, 1999, 12 (04) :398-419
[7]  
Dancy Jonathan, 2004, ETHICS PRINCIPLES, P73
[8]  
Dancy Jonathan, 2006, REASON VALUE THEMES, P91
[9]   The Supererogatory, and How to Accommodate It [J].
Dorsey, Dale .
UTILITAS, 2013, 25 (03) :355-382
[10]   Weak Anti-Rationalism and the Demands of Morality [J].
Dorsey, Dale .
NOUS, 2012, 46 (01) :1-23