Positive predictive value of prostate biopsy indicated by prostate-specific-antigen-based prostate cancer screening: trends over time in a European randomized trial

被引:37
|
作者
Bokhorst, Leonard P. [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaoye [1 ]
Bul, Meelan [1 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [1 ]
Schroder, Fritz H. [1 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
biopsy; predictive value of tests; positive predictive value; prostatic neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen; PSA; screening; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; RISK; ERSPC; MEN; ULTRASOUND; ROTTERDAM; MORTALITY; CARCINOMA; LEVEL; NG/ML;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11481.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To assess the positive predictive value (PPV) of prostate biopsy, indicated by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold of =3.0 ng/mL, over time, in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In the Rotterdam section of the ERSPC, a total of 42 376 participants, aged 5574 years, identified from population registries were randomly assigned to a screening or control arm. For the ERSPC men undergo PSA screening at 4-year intervals. A total of three screening rounds were evaluated; therefore, only men aged 5569 years at the first screening were eligible for the present study. RESULTS PPVs for men without previous biopsy remained equal throughout the three subsequent screenings (25.5, 22.3 and 24.8% respectively). Conversely, PPVs for men with a previous negative biopsy dropped significantly (12.0 and 15.2% at the second and third screening, respectively). Additionally, in men with and without previous biopsy, the percentage of aggressive prostate cancers (clinical stage >T2b, Gleason score =7) decreased after the first round of screening from 44.4 to 23.8% in the second (P < 0.001) and 18.6% in the third round (P < 0.001). Repeat biopsies accounted for 24.6% of all biopsies, but yielded only 8.6% of all aggressive cancers. CONCLUSIONS In consecutive screening rounds the PPV of PSA-based screening remains equal in previously unbiopsied men. In men with a previous negative biopsy the PPV drops considerably, but 20% of cancers detected still show aggressive characteristics. Individualized screening algorithms should incorporate previous biopsy status in the decision to perform a repeat biopsy with the aim of further reducing unnecessary biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:1654 / 1660
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate Specific Antigen and Biopsy Contamination in the Goteborg-1 Randomized, Population-Based, Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
    Stinesen Kollberg, K.
    Holmberg, E.
    Josefsson, A.
    Hugosson, J.
    Arnsrud Godtman, R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (05) : 1018 - 1027
  • [2] On the use of prostate-specific antigen for screening of prostate cancer in European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van Schaik, Ron H.
    Blijenberg, Bert G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Lilja, Hans
    Stenman, Ulf-Hakan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (17) : 3109 - 3119
  • [3] Prostate-specific Antigen-Based Prostate Cancer Screening: Reduction of Prostate Cancer Mortality After Correction for Nonattendance and Contamination in the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    Lous, Jan J.
    Moss, Sue M.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (02) : 329 - 336
  • [4] Impact of Recent Screening on Predicting the Outcome of Prostate Cancer Biopsy in Men With Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Data From the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Aus, Gunnar
    Pihl, Carl-Gustav
    Becker, Charlotte
    Pettersson, Kim
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Lilja, Hans
    CANCER, 2010, 116 (11) : 2612 - 2620
  • [5] Structured Population-based Prostate-specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2019
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Albers, Peter
    Abrahamsson, Per-Anders
    Briganti, Alberto
    Cattoe, James Wf
    Chapplef, Christopher R.
    Montorsia, Francesco
    Mottetg, Nicolas
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Sonksen, Jens
    Wirth, Manfred
    van Poppel, Hendrik
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (02) : 142 - 150
  • [6] Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: Past and future
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 524 - 532
  • [7] The use of European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer calculator as a diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy indication
    Breza, J.
    Subin, F.
    Bernadic, M.
    Tomas, M.
    Pindak, D.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2019, 120 (05): : 331 - 335
  • [8] Randomized controlled screening trials for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen: a tale of contrasts
    Rove, Kyle O.
    Crawford, E. David
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 137 - 142
  • [9] Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity Selective for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Screening? European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam)
    Wolters, Tineke
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (02) : 385 - 393
  • [10] Prostate specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination before and during a randomized trial of screening for prostate cancer:: European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Rotterdam
    Beemsterboer, PMM
    de Koning, HJ
    Kranse, R
    Trienekens, PH
    van der Maas, PJ
    Schröder, FH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (04) : 1216 - 1220