Patient-level costs in margin re-excision for breast-conserving surgery

被引:38
作者
Grant, Y. [1 ]
Al-Khudairi, R. [1 ]
St John, E. [1 ]
Barschkett, M. [1 ]
Cunningham, D. [2 ]
Al-Mufti, R. [2 ]
Hogben, K. [2 ]
Thiruchelvam, P. [2 ]
Hadjiminas, D. J. [2 ]
Darzi, A. [1 ]
Carter, A. W. [1 ]
Leff, D. R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept BioSurg & Surg Technol, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Breast Unit, London, England
关键词
20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CANCER; MASTECTOMY; THERAPY; WOMEN; TRIAL; LUMPECTOMY; PATHOLOGY; RATES;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11050
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: High rates of reoperation following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for positive margins are associated with costs to healthcare providers. The aim was to assess the quality of evidence on reported re-excision costs and compare the direct patient-level costs between patients undergoing successful BCS versus reoperations after BCS. Methods: The study used data from women who had BCS with or without reoperation at a single institution between April 2015 and March 2016. A systematic review of health economic analysis in BCS was conducted and scored using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. Financial data were retrieved using the Patient-Level Information and Costing Systems (PLICS) for patients. Exchange rates used were: US $1 = 0.75 pound, 1 pound = (sic)1.14 and US $1 = (sic)0.85. Results: The median QHES score was 47 (i.q.r. 32.5-79). Only two of nine studies scored in the upper QHES quartile (score at least 75). Costs of initial lumpectomy and reoperation were in the range US$ 1234-11786 and $655-9136 respectively. Over a 12-month interval, 153 patients had definitive BCS and 59 patients underwent reoperation. The median cost of reoperations after BCS (59 patients) was 4511 pound (range 1752-18019), representing an additional 2136 pound per patient compared with BCS without reoperation (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The systematic review demonstrated variation in methodological approach to cost estimates and a paucity of high-quality cost estimate studies for reoperations. Extrapolating local PLICS data to a national level suggests that getting BCS right first time could result in substantial savings.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 394
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Margin Re-excision and Local Recurrence in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Cost Analysis Using a Decision Tree Model [J].
Abe, Shoko E. ;
Hill, Joshua S. ;
Han, Yimei ;
Walsh, Kendall ;
Symanowski, James T. ;
Hadzikadic-Gusic, Lejla ;
Flippo-Morton, Teresa ;
Sarantou, Terry ;
Forster, Meghan ;
White, Richard L., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 112 (04) :443-448
[2]  
[Anonymous], GETT RIGHT 1 TIM PRO
[3]  
[Anonymous], PAT LEV COST CAS CHA
[4]  
[Anonymous], UND GEN LEDG COST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Breast cancer statistics
[6]  
[Anonymous], PATIENT LEVEL COSTIN
[7]   Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: Patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data [J].
Arriagada, R ;
Le, MG ;
Rochard, F ;
Contesso, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (05) :1558-1564
[8]  
Blichert-Toft M, 1992, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P19
[9]  
CARTER C, 2016, OPERATIONAL PRODUCTI
[10]   A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer [J].
Chagpar, Anees B. ;
Killelea, Brigid K. ;
Tsangaris, Theodore N. ;
Butler, Meghan ;
Stavris, Karen ;
Li, Fangyong ;
Yao, Xiaopan ;
Bossuyt, Veerle ;
Harigopal, Malini ;
Lannin, Donald R. ;
Pusztai, Lajos ;
Horowitz, Nina R. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (06) :503-510