Segmenting supplies and suppliers: bringing together the purchasing portfolio matrix and the supplier potential matrix

被引:40
作者
Rezaei, Jafar [1 ]
Lajimi, Hamidreza Fallah [2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Mazandaran, Fac Management, Mazandaran, Iran
关键词
Purchasing portfolio matrix; supplier potential matrix; supplier segmentation; best worst method (BWM); PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; MODEL; CHAIN; COMMITMENT; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY; DRIVERS; AGILE;
D O I
10.1080/13675567.2018.1535649
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Supplier segmentation is one of the most important supply chain-related activities for most firms working with multiple suppliers. Purchasing portfolio matrix (PPM) is a segmentation method that considers two dimensions (profit impact and supply risk) against which the materials purchased by the company are classified. Despite its popularity, PPM has been the subject of serious criticism. A new approach to supplier segmentation, called supplier potential matrix (SPM), aims to fulfil the need for a unifying framework that includes all the important variables under two overarching dimensions: supplier capabilities and supplier willingness. While the focus of PPM is on supply, SPM mainly focuses on relationship. However, it is important to include both the supplies and the relationship with those who supply, the suppliers. The main purpose of this study is to bring these two approaches together through a hybrid matrix called PPM-SPM. Data is collected from a company working with 70 suppliers. Best worst method (BWM), is used to determine the weights of the criteria we need for the two segmentation approaches. The suppliers are segmented based on the two approaches. A combined PPM-SPM segmentation is then proposed and discussed. The results show that the combined approach improves supplier management.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 436
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[41]   A fuzzy logic approach to supplier evaluation for development [J].
Osiro, Lauro ;
Lima-Junior, Francisco R. ;
Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014, 153 :95-112
[42]   Positioning of commodities using the Kraljic Portfolio Matrix [J].
Padhi, Sidhartha S. ;
Wagner, Stephan M. ;
Aggarwal, Vijay .
JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 18 (01) :1-8
[43]   A Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Suppliers Selection [J].
Parthiban, P. ;
Zubar, H. Abdul ;
Garge, Chintamani P. .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING OPTIMIZATION AND COMPUTING, 2012, 38 :2312-2328
[44]  
Pi WN, 2006, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V27, P625, DOI [10.1007/s00170-004-2227-z, 10.1007/s00170-004-2227-7]
[45]   Supplier evaluations: communication strategies to improve supplier performance [J].
Prahinski, C ;
Benton, WC .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2004, 22 (01) :39-62
[46]  
Rezaei J., 2018, PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY
[47]  
Rezaei J., 2018, MANAGEMENT DECISION
[48]   Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method [J].
Rezaei, Jafar ;
van Roekel, Wilco S. ;
Tavasszy, Lori .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2018, 68 :158-169
[49]   Supply chain drivers, partnerships and performance of high-tech SMEs: An empirical study using SEM [J].
Rezaei, Jafar ;
Ortt, Roland ;
Trott, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 67 (04) :629-653
[50]   Quality assessment of airline baggage handling systems using SERVQUAL and BWM [J].
Rezaei, Jafar ;
Kothadiya, Oshan ;
Tavasszy, Lori ;
Kroesen, Maarten .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 66 :85-93