Segmenting supplies and suppliers: bringing together the purchasing portfolio matrix and the supplier potential matrix

被引:40
作者
Rezaei, Jafar [1 ]
Lajimi, Hamidreza Fallah [2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Mazandaran, Fac Management, Mazandaran, Iran
关键词
Purchasing portfolio matrix; supplier potential matrix; supplier segmentation; best worst method (BWM); PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; MODEL; CHAIN; COMMITMENT; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY; DRIVERS; AGILE;
D O I
10.1080/13675567.2018.1535649
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Supplier segmentation is one of the most important supply chain-related activities for most firms working with multiple suppliers. Purchasing portfolio matrix (PPM) is a segmentation method that considers two dimensions (profit impact and supply risk) against which the materials purchased by the company are classified. Despite its popularity, PPM has been the subject of serious criticism. A new approach to supplier segmentation, called supplier potential matrix (SPM), aims to fulfil the need for a unifying framework that includes all the important variables under two overarching dimensions: supplier capabilities and supplier willingness. While the focus of PPM is on supply, SPM mainly focuses on relationship. However, it is important to include both the supplies and the relationship with those who supply, the suppliers. The main purpose of this study is to bring these two approaches together through a hybrid matrix called PPM-SPM. Data is collected from a company working with 70 suppliers. Best worst method (BWM), is used to determine the weights of the criteria we need for the two segmentation approaches. The suppliers are segmented based on the two approaches. A combined PPM-SPM segmentation is then proposed and discussed. The results show that the combined approach improves supplier management.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 436
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Modeling agility of supply [J].
Agarwal, Ashish ;
Shankar, Ravi ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2007, 36 (04) :443-457
[2]   Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach [J].
Agarwal, Ashish ;
Shankar, Ravi ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 173 (01) :211-225
[3]   Evaluating suppliers to include green supplier development programs via fuzzy c-means and VIKOR methods [J].
Akman, Gulsen .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 86 :69-82
[4]  
Bartezzaghi E., 2004, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V10, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2004.09.005
[5]   Identifying and prioritizing foreign companies interested in participating in post-sanctions Iranian energy sector [J].
Bonyani, Abbas ;
Alimohammadlou, Moslem .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2018, 21 :180-190
[6]   A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Cifci, Gizem .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2011, 62 (02) :164-174
[7]  
Caniels M.C.J., 2005, Journal of Purchasing Supply Management, V11, P141, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PURSUP.2005.10.004
[8]   Power and interdependence in buyer supplier relationships:: A purchasing portfolio approach [J].
Caniels, Marjolein C. J. ;
Gelderman, Cees J. .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2007, 36 (02) :219-229
[9]   Applying a direct multi-granularity linguistic and strategy-oriented aggregation approach on the assessment of supply performance [J].
Chang, Sheng-Lin ;
Wang, Reay-Chen ;
Wang, Shih-Yuan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 177 (02) :1013-1025
[10]   Development of a case based intelligent supplier relationship management system - linking supplier rating system and product coding system [J].
Choy, KL ;
Lee, WB ;
Lo, V .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2004, 9 (01) :86-101