The carbon impact of flying to economics conferences: is flying more associated with more citations?

被引:25
作者
Chalvatzis, Konstantinos [1 ]
Ormosi, Peter L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Business Sch, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] UEA, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ East Anglia, Ctr Competit Policy, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Carbon-impact; flying; academic conferences; economics; ACADEMIC CONFERENCES; FOOTPRINT; TRAVEL; KNOWLEDGE; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09669582.2020.1806858
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An increasing body of literature has highlighted the significant carbon impact of academic conferences. Our paper further adds to this growing body of evidence by introducing a newly assembled dataset from a sample of 263 economics conferences, including 55,006 presentations by 26,312 academics. First, we offer a detailed description of the travelling pattern of academics presenting their work at these conferences, and highlight the main differences between academics and institutions in different geographical regions. Academic conferences are intuitively linked to increased dissemination in the expectation that they boost various impact metrics. For this reason we look at the relative role of the distance travelled and the number of trips made to present each paper in driving the number of citations these papers receive. We present evidence that the number of trips matters for more citations but longer distances are only associated with higher citation numbers for European academics. The potential reasons behind this heterogeneity are discussed in detail. Our results offer support to recent evidence showing that higher carbon impact is not necessarily associated with enhanced academic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 67
页数:28
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]  
Carr T., 2017, INT J ED DEV USING I, V13, P116
[12]   The Role of Conferences on the Pathway to Academic Impact Evidence from a Natural Experiment [J].
de Leon, Fernanda Leite Lopez ;
McQuillin, Ben .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2020, 55 (01) :164-193
[13]   Videoconferencing as a Mode of Communication: A Comparative Study of the Use of Videoconferencing and Face-to-Face Meetings [J].
Denstadli, Jon Martin ;
Julsrud, Tom Erik ;
Hjorthol, Randi Johanne .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2012, 26 (01) :65-91
[14]   How international is the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers? A social network analysis perspective [J].
Derudder, Ben ;
Liu, Xingjian .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2016, 48 (02) :309-329
[16]   International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer [J].
Edler, Jakob ;
Fier, Heide ;
Grimpe, Christoph .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (06) :791-804
[17]  
Elliott A., 2010, Mobile Lives
[18]   Why do we fly? Ecologists' sins of emission [J].
Fox, Helen E. ;
Kareiva, Peter ;
Silliman, Brian ;
Hitt, Jessica ;
Lytle, David A. ;
Halpern, Benjamin S. ;
Hawkes, Christine V. ;
Lawler, Joshua ;
Neel, Maile ;
Olden, Julian D. ;
Schlaepfer, Martin A. ;
Smith, Katherine ;
Tallis, Heather .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (06) :294-296
[19]   The value of virtual conferencing for ecology and conservation [J].
Fraser, Hannah ;
Soanes, Kylie ;
Jones, Stuart A. ;
Jones, Chris S. ;
Malishev, Matthew .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (03) :540-546
[20]   Can we fly less? Evaluating the 'necessity' of air travel [J].
Gossling, Stefan ;
Hanna, Paul ;
Higham, James ;
Cohen, Scott ;
Hopkins, Debbie .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 81