Is There a Role for Assent or Dissent in Animal Research?

被引:21
作者
Kantin, Holly [1 ]
Wendler, David [2 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Dept Bioeth, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NIH, Sect Res Eth, Dept Bioeth, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
animals used for research; assent or dissent in animal research; respecting preferences of animal research subjects; CHIMPANZEES; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1017/S0963180115000110
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Current regulations and widely accepted principles for animal research focus on minimizing the burdens and harms of research on animals. However, these regulations and principles do not consider a possible role for assent or dissent in animal research. Should investigators solicit the assent or respect the dissent of animals who are used in research, and, if so, under what circumstances? In this article we pursue this question and outline the relevant issues that bear on the answer. We distinguish two general reasons for respecting the preferences of research participants regarding whether they participate in research-welfare-based reasons and agency-based reasons. We argue that there are welfare-based reasons for researchers to consider, and in some cases respect, the dissent of all animals used in research. After providing a brief account of the nature of agency-based reasons, we argue that there is good reason to think that these reasons apply to at least chimpanzees. We argue that there is an additional reason for researchers to respect the dissent-and, when possible, solicit the assent-of any animal to whom agency-based reasons apply.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 472
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reimagining Assent: When Things Get Lost in Translation in International Pediatric Research
    Saleem, Sarosh
    ASIAN BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2025, 17 (02) : 307 - 324
  • [22] The Ethical Inclusion of Children With Psychotic Disorders in Research: Recommendations for an Educative, Multimodal Assent Process
    Frost, Katherine H.
    Lincoln, Sarah Hope
    Norkett, Emily M.
    Jin, Michelle X.
    Gonzalez-Heydrich, Joseph
    D'Angelo, Eugene J.
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2016, 26 (02) : 163 - 175
  • [23] The ethics of animal research
    Spelman, FA
    SECOND JOINT EMBS-BMES CONFERENCE 2002, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: BIOENGINEERING - INTEGRATIVE METHODOLOGIES, NEW TECHNOLOGIES, 2002, : 2670 - 2671
  • [24] Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: A comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials
    Kimberly, MB
    Hoehn, KS
    Feudtner, C
    Nelson, RM
    Schreiner, M
    PEDIATRICS, 2006, 117 (05) : 1706 - 1711
  • [25] Research ethics in animal models
    Miziara, Ivan Dieb
    de Matos Magalhaes, Ana Tereza
    Santos, Maruska d'Aparecida
    Gomes, Erika Ferreira
    de Oliveira, Reinaldo Ayer
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 78 (02) : 128 - 131
  • [26] Reforming the politics of animal research
    Levin, Lisa Hara
    Reppy, William A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2015, 41 (07) : 563 - 566
  • [27] Five points and a lament about Range and Cotton's ''Reports of assent and permission in research with children: Illustrations and suggestions''
    Roberts, MC
    Buckloh, LM
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 1995, 5 (04) : 333 - 344
  • [28] The role of animal science in the public discussion about animal husbandry
    Goetz, K. -U.
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2016, 88 (01): : 13 - 18
  • [29] Assent in Pediatric Critical Care Research: A Cross-Sectional Stakeholder Survey of Canadian Research Ethics Boards, Research Coordinators, Pediatric Critical Care Researchers, and Nurses*
    O'Hearn, Katie
    Cayouette, Florence
    Cameron, Saoirse
    Martin, Dori-Ann
    Tsampalieros, Anne
    Menon, Kusum
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (04) : E179 - E189
  • [30] Benefits, necessity and justification in animal research
    Jennings, M
    Silcock, S
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 1995, 23 (06): : 828 - 836