Differences in Dermoscopic Images from Nonpolarized Dermoscope and Polarized Dermoscope Influence the Diagnostic Accuracy and Confidence Level: A Pilot Study

被引:47
作者
Wang, Steven Q. [1 ]
Dusza, Stephen W. [1 ]
Scope, Alon [1 ]
Braun, Ralph P. [2 ]
Kope, Alfred W. [3 ]
Marghoob, Ashfaq A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dermatol Serv, New York, NY 10022 USA
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Dermatol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34293.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Studies have demonstrated differences in colors and dermoscopic structures observed with polarized dermoscopes (PDs) and nonpolarized dermoscopes (NPDs). OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate whether diagnosis and diagnostic confidence changes when viewing dermoscopic images from NPDs and PDs. METHODS A total of 100 dermatologists participated in the study. Twenty-five pigmented lesions were shown in the study, consisting of 7 seborrheic keratoses (SK), 3 basal cell carcinomas, 2 atypical nevi, 5 malignant melanomas (MM), 3 dermatofibromas, 3 blue nevi, and 2 hemangiomas. Two images of each lesion (one NPD and one PD) were included. The McNemar test and paired t-test were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS Ninety-one participants completed the study. Significant differences in the diagnoses were observed for the SK, atypical nevus, and MM images. Seventy-five percent and 59% of the final participants correctly diagnosed SK when presented with the NPD and PD images, respectively. For MM, 23 and 34% made the correct diagnoses with the NPD and PD images, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Viewing lesions with NPD versus PD can affect the diagnosis and diagnostic confidence of physicians that are novices with dermoscopy. Further studies including physicians at different expertise levels and a larger sample of lesions are needed to further explore the differences.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1395
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Conventional and polarized dermoscopy features of dermatofibroma [J].
Agero, Anna Liza C. ;
Taliercio, Salvatore ;
Dusza, Stephen W. ;
Salaro, Cristina ;
Chu, Paul ;
Marghoob, Ashfaq A. .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 142 (11) :1431-1437
[2]   POLARIZED-LIGHT EXAMINATION AND PHOTOGRAPHY OF THE SKIN [J].
ANDERSON, RR .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 127 (07) :1000-1005
[3]  
Bafounta ML, 2001, ARCH DERMATOL, V137, P1343
[4]   Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions [J].
Benvenuto-Andrade, Cristiane ;
Dusza, Stephen W. ;
Agero, Anna Liza C. ;
Scope, Alon ;
Rajadhyaksha, Milind ;
Halpern, Allan C. ;
Marghoob, Ashfaq A. .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 143 (03) :329-338
[5]   Level of confidence in diagnosis: Clinical examination versus dermoscopy examination [J].
Benvenuto-Andrade, Cristiane ;
Dusza, Stephen W. ;
Hay, Jennifer L. ;
Agero, Anna Liza C. ;
Halpern, Allan C. ;
Kopf, Alfred W. ;
Marghoob, Ashfaq A. .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2006, 32 (05) :738-744
[6]   An evaluation of dermoscopy fluids and application techniques [J].
Gewirtzman, AJ ;
Saurat, JH ;
Braun, RP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 149 (01) :59-63
[7]   Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy [J].
Kittler, H ;
Pehamberger, H ;
Wolff, K ;
Binder, M .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2002, 3 (03) :159-165
[8]   Complementary use of cross-polarization and standard OCT for differential diagnosis of pathological tissues [J].
Kuranov, RV ;
Sapozhnikova, VV ;
Turchin, IV ;
Zagainova, EV ;
Gelikonov, VM ;
Kamensky, VA ;
Snopova, LB ;
Prodanetz, NN .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2002, 10 (15) :707-713
[9]  
MacKie R M, 1972, Br J Plast Surg, V25, P123, DOI 10.1016/S0007-1226(72)80032-8
[10]   AID TO PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PIGMENTED LESIONS OF SKIN [J].
MACKIE, RM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1971, 85 (03) :232-&