Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach

被引:90
作者
Ansell, Christopher [1 ]
Doberstein, Carey [2 ]
Henderson, Hayley [3 ]
Siddiki, Saba [4 ]
t'Hart, Paul [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Polit Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Polit Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Syracuse Univ, Maxwell Sch Citizenship & Publ Affairs, Syracuse, NY USA
[5] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Sch Governance, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Collaborative governance; inclusion; inclusion management; network management; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; DECISION-MAKING; NETWORKS; FRAMEWORK; PERFORMANCE; LEADERSHIP; CONSENSUS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Who should be included in collaborative governance and how they should be included is an important topic, though the dynamics of inclusion are not yet well understood. We propose a conceptual model to shape the empirical analysis of what contributes to inclusion in collaborative processes. We propose that incentives, mutual interdependence and trust are important preconditions of inclusion, but that active inclusion management also matters a great deal. We also hypothesize that inclusion is strategic, with 'selective activation' of participants depending on functional and pragmatic choices. Drawing on cases from the Collaborative Governance Case Databank, we used a mixed method approach to analyse our model. We found support for the model, and particularly for the central importance of active inclusion management.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 591
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coping with waste: A government-NGO collaborative governance approach in Shanghai
    Arantes, Virginie
    Zou, Can
    Che, Yue
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 259
  • [42] Recognising Ecological Reflexivity: An Alternative Approach to Partnership Capabilities for Collaborative Governance
    Stanberry, Joanna
    Murphy, David F.
    Balda, Janis Bragan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (16)
  • [43] Paradoxes in collaborative governance
    Qi, Huiting
    Ran, Bing
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 26 (10) : 2728 - 2753
  • [44] Leading Collaborative Governance in the Cultural. Sector: The Participatory Cases of Korean Arts Organizations
    Jeon, JooHee
    Kim, HwiJung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 (01) : 63 - 74
  • [45] Evaluation of the Synergy Degree of Watershed Collaborative Governance: A Case Study of Taihu Basin, China
    Huang, Xiaofeng
    Qiu, Weijian
    Dai, Xingying
    Hua, Wenwen
    WATER, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [46] Examining students' understanding of burglary behaviour: a virtual reality, mixed methods approach
    Lunt, Robyn
    Talbot, Matthew
    CRIME PREVENTION & COMMUNITY SAFETY, 2025,
  • [47] Mundane dynamics: Understanding collaborative governance approaches to 'big' problems through studying 'small' practices
    La Grouw, Yvonne
    van der Woerd, Oemar
    Visser, E. Lianne
    Blijleven, Wieke
    PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2024, 39 (03) : 412 - 435
  • [48] Assessing drivers of sustained engagement in collaborative governance arrangements
    Ambrose, Graham
    Siddiki, Saba
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2024, 34 (04) : 498 - 514
  • [49] Exploring the Role of Dynamic Social Capital in Collaborative Governance
    Oh, Youngmin
    Bush, Carrie Blanchard
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2016, 48 (02) : 216 - 236
  • [50] Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes: A Performance Matrix
    Emerson, Kirk
    Nabatchi, Tina
    PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 38 (04) : 717 - 747