共 50 条
Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach
被引:90
作者:
Ansell, Christopher
[1
]
Doberstein, Carey
[2
]
Henderson, Hayley
[3
]
Siddiki, Saba
[4
]
t'Hart, Paul
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Polit Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Polit Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Syracuse Univ, Maxwell Sch Citizenship & Publ Affairs, Syracuse, NY USA
[5] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Sch Governance, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金:
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词:
Collaborative governance;
inclusion;
inclusion management;
network management;
PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION;
DECISION-MAKING;
NETWORKS;
FRAMEWORK;
PERFORMANCE;
LEADERSHIP;
CONSENSUS;
MODEL;
D O I:
10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726
中图分类号:
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号:
0302 ;
030201 ;
摘要:
Who should be included in collaborative governance and how they should be included is an important topic, though the dynamics of inclusion are not yet well understood. We propose a conceptual model to shape the empirical analysis of what contributes to inclusion in collaborative processes. We propose that incentives, mutual interdependence and trust are important preconditions of inclusion, but that active inclusion management also matters a great deal. We also hypothesize that inclusion is strategic, with 'selective activation' of participants depending on functional and pragmatic choices. Drawing on cases from the Collaborative Governance Case Databank, we used a mixed method approach to analyse our model. We found support for the model, and particularly for the central importance of active inclusion management.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 591
页数:22
相关论文