Cost-utility analysis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis screening

被引:47
|
作者
Zhang, Eric [1 ,5 ]
Wartelle-Bladou, Claire [2 ]
Lepanto, Luigi [1 ,3 ]
Lachaine, Jean [4 ]
Cloutier, Guy [1 ,5 ]
Tang, An [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Radiol Radiooncol & Nucl Med, St Luc Hosp, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, St Luc Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, St Luc Hosp, Hlth Technol Assessment Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Fac Pharm & Pharmacoecon, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal Hosp Res Ctr CRCHUM, Lab Biorheol & Med Ultrason, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); Fibrosis; Elastography; Screening; FATTY LIVER-DISEASE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-STATE UTILITIES; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY; NATURAL-HISTORY; VITAMIN-E; HEPATIC-FIBROSIS; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-3731-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in Western countries. No studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of screening its advanced form, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We performed a cost-utility analysis of annual noninvasive screening strategies using third-party payer perspective in a general population in comparison to screening a high-risk obese or diabetic population. Screening algorithms involved well-studied techniques, including NAFLD fibrosis score, transient elastography (TE), and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging for detecting advanced fibrosis (a parts per thousand yen F3); and plasma cytokeratin (CK)-18 for NASH detection. Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) were compared as confirmation methods. Canadian dollar (CAD or C$) costs were adjusted for inflation and discounted at 5 %. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of a parts per thousand currency signC$ 50,000 was considered cost-effective. Compared with no screening, screening with NAFLD fibrosis score/TE/CK-18 algorithm with MRE as confirmation for advanced fibrosis had an ICER of C$ 26,143 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Screening in high-risk obese or diabetic populations was more cost-effective, with an ICER of C$ 9,051 and C$ 7,991 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, respectively. Liver biopsy confirmation was not found to be cost-effective. Our model suggests that annual NASH screening in high-risk obese or diabetic populations can be cost-effective. aEuro cent This cost-utility analysis suggests that screening for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis may be cost-effective. aEuro cent In particular, screening of high-risk obese or diabetic populations is more cost-effective. aEuro cent Magnetic resonance elastography was more cost-effective to confirm disease compared to biopsy. aEuro cent More studies are needed to determine quality of life in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. aEuro cent More management strategies for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are also needed.
引用
收藏
页码:3282 / 3294
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Review of the Literature and Updates in Management
    Pasumarthy, Lakshmi
    Srour, James
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 103 (06) : 547 - 550
  • [22] Cost-utility analysis in spine care: a systematic review
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Wilkinson, Sean M.
    Radcliff, Kristen E.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Anderson, David G.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Albert, Todd J.
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (08) : 676 - 690
  • [23] AIMING FOR THE BULL'S EYE: The Cost-Utility of Screening for Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy
    McClellan, Andrew J.
    Chang, Jonathan S.
    Smiddy, William E.
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2016, 36 (10): : 1958 - 1963
  • [24] Cost-utility analysis of taxane therapy
    Yee, GC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1997, 54 : S11 - S15
  • [25] Surveillance of cirrhosis for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-utility analysis
    Coon, J. Thompson
    Rogers, G.
    Hewson, P.
    Wright, D.
    Anderson, R.
    Jackson, S.
    Ryder, S.
    Cramp, M.
    Stein, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 98 (07) : 1166 - 1175
  • [26] Cost-utility analysis of screening high-risk groups for anal cancer
    Karnon, Jonathan
    Jones, Roy
    Czoski-Murray, Carolyn
    Srnith, Kevin J.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 30 (03) : 293 - 304
  • [27] Condom distribution: a cost-utility analysis
    Bedimo, AL
    Pinkerton, SD
    Cohen, DA
    Gray, B
    Farley, TA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2002, 13 (06) : 384 - 392
  • [28] Screening and Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Wildfire Evacuees: A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Lebenbaum, Michael
    Hassan, S. Ahmed
    MDM POLICY & PRACTICE, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [29] A cost-utility analysis of cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus vaccination in the Philippines
    Guerrero, Anna Melissa
    Genuino, Anne Julienne
    Santillan, Melanie
    Praditsitthikorn, Naiyana
    Chantarastapornchit, Varit
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    Alejandria, Marissa
    Toral, Jean Anne
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
  • [30] Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
    Ratziu, V
    Tahiri, M
    Bonyhay, L
    ANNALES D ENDOCRINOLOGIE, 2005, 66 (02) : S71 - S80