Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of cadmium ions with anionic-nonionic surfactants

被引:68
|
作者
Fang, Yao-Yao [1 ]
Zeng, Guang-Ming [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Jin-Hui [1 ]
Liu, Jian-Xiao [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xiang-Min [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ke [1 ]
Qu, Yun-Huan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Ocean Univ China, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Qingdao 266003, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
micellar enhanced ultrafiltration; surfactant; cadmium; micelle rejection; sodium doclecylsulfate; dynamic light scattering;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.042
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF), a surfactant-based separation process, is promising in removing multivalent metal ions from aqueous solutions. The micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of cadmium from aqueous solution was studied in systems of anionic surfactant and mixed anionic/nonionic surfactants. The micelle sizes and zeta potentials were investigated by dynamic light scattering measurements. The effects of feed surfactant concentration, cadmium concentration and the molar ratio of nonionic surfactants to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on the cadmium removal efficiency, the rejection of SIDS and nonionic surfactants and the permeate flux were investigated. The rejection efficiencies of cadmium in the MEUF operation were enhanced with higher SDS concentration and moderate Cd concentration. When SIDS concentration was fixed at 3 mM, the optimal ranges of the molar ratios of nonionic surfactants to SIDS for the removal of cadmium were 0.4-0.7 for Brij 35 and 0.5-0.7 for Triton X-100, respectively. With the addition of nonionic surfactants, the SDS dosage and the SDS concentration in the permeate were reduced efficiently. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 519
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Removal of chromate anions by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using cationic surfactants
    Gzara, L
    Dhahbi, M
    DESALINATION, 2001, 137 (1-3) : 241 - 250
  • [22] Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for the solubilization of various phenolic compounds with different surfactants
    Huang, Jin-Hui
    Zhao, Yong
    Zeng, Guang-Ming
    Peng, Lei
    Li, Xue
    Liu, Liu-Xia
    Li, Fei
    Shi, Li-Xiu
    Yuan, Fang
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 72 (04) : 623 - 631
  • [23] Influence of non-ionic surfactants on reverse micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration
    Nguyen, L. A. T.
    Schwarze, M.
    Drews, A.
    Kraume, M.
    Schomaecker, R.
    Boehm, L.
    EUROMEMBRANE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, 44 : 1692 - 1694
  • [24] Removal of copper ions and dissolved phenol from water using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration with mixed surfactants
    Tung, CC
    Yang, YM
    Chang, CH
    Maa, JR
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (07) : 695 - 701
  • [27] Exergy analysis of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration
    Chavan, Karan R.
    Gopalan, Srivats
    Marathe, Kumudini V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2016, 20 (02) : 139 - 149
  • [28] PRECONCENTRATION OF ALUMINUM BY MICELLAR-ENHANCED ULTRAFILTRATION
    DELAGUARDIA, M
    PERISCARDELLS, E
    MORALESRUBIO, A
    BIANCOPREVOT, A
    PRAMAURO, E
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1993, 276 (01) : 173 - 179
  • [29] Recovery of Anionic Surfactant Through Acidification/Ultrafiltration in a Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Process for Cobalt Removal
    Tortora, Francesco
    Innocenzi, Valentina
    De Michelis, Ida
    Veglio, Francesco
    di Celso, Giuseppe Mazziotti
    Prisciandaro, Marina
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2018, 35 (05) : 493 - 500
  • [30] Competitive bind of anionic metals with cetylpyridinium chloride micelle in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration
    Baek, K
    Yang, JW
    DESALINATION, 2004, 167 (1-3) : 101 - 110