Self-efficacy, overconfidence, and the negative effect on subsequent performance: A field study

被引:75
作者
Moores, Trevor T. [1 ]
Chang, Jerry Cha-Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Management Informat Syst, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
关键词
Field study; Metacognition; Overconfidence; Performance; PLS; Self-efficacy; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; PERSONAL GOALS; TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER; MODEL; CONCEPTUALIZATION; ENVIRONMENTS; PERSPECTIVE; SUCCESS; USAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2008.11.006
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Self-efficacy has been used to predict the level of performance or usage of IT. The psychological literature has Suggested, however, that rather than promoting behavior, it can lead to overconfidence and reduce performance over time. We investigated this claim by studying the relationship between self-efficacy and performance in a field study. Overconfidence was measured metacognitively as the difference between a person's expected performance and his or her actual performance. Using PLS and a sample of 108 students in an systems analysis and design course, we found that for the sample as a whole, self-efficacy was positively and significantly related to performance, and that performance was positively and significantly related to Subsequent self-efficacy. When levels of over- and under-confidence were taken into account, however, the relationships changed. in particular, overconfidence leads to a significant negative relationship between self-efficacy and subsequent performance. Implications for user training included the need to use performance feedback in order to allow for a recalibration of self-efficacy towards a more accurate self-assessment of ability. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited [J].
Bandura, A ;
Locke, EA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (01) :87-99
[2]   SELF-REGULATORY MECHANISMS GOVERNING THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL-COMPARISON ON COMPLEX DECISION-MAKING [J].
BANDURA, A ;
JOURDEN, FJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 60 (06) :941-951
[3]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[4]  
Bhattacherjee A, 2004, MIS QUART, V28, P229
[5]   Testing the interaction effects of task complexity in computer training using the social cognitive model [J].
Bolt, MA ;
Killough, LN ;
Koh, HC .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2001, 32 (01) :1-20
[6]   Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value [J].
Chiu, Chao-Min ;
Wang, Eric T. G. .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 45 (03) :194-201
[7]   Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study [J].
Compeau, D ;
Higgins, CA ;
Huff, S .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1999, 23 (02) :145-158
[8]   Fostering constructive cognitive and metacognitive activity in computer-based complex task training environments [J].
Cuevas, HM ;
Fiore, SM ;
Bowers, CA ;
Salas, E .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2004, 20 (02) :225-241
[9]   Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on IS acceptance [J].
Hasan, Bassam .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2006, 43 (05) :565-571
[10]   The predictive validity of self-efficacy in training performance: Little more than past performance [J].
Heggestad, ED ;
Kanfer, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2005, 11 (02) :84-97