Limitation of the model for end-stage liver disease for outcome prediction in patients with cirrhosis-related complications

被引:46
作者
Huo, TI [1 ]
Lin, HC
Wu, JC
Hou, MC
Lee, FY
Lee, PC
Chang, FY
Lee, SD
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Educ, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
esophageal varices; hepatic encephalopathy; liver cirrhosis; liver transplantation; MELD; spontaneous bacterial peritonitis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00463.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has been used to prioritize cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation. Bleeding esophageal varices, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatic encephalopathy are major complications of cirrhosis and traditional indications for liver transplantation evaluation. However, these complications are not included in the MELD and it is not clear if these complications correlate with MELD score in terms of outcome prediction. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of cirrhosis-related complication as a prognostic predictor in 290 cirrhotic patients. The MELD score and outcome were compared between patients with and without cirrhosis-related complications. There was no significant difference of the MELD score between patients with (n=67) and without (n=223) complications (11.6 +/- 2.9 vs. 12.2 +/- 3.2, p=0.184). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.687 for MELD vs. 0.604 for complications (p=0.174) at six months, and the area was 0.641 for MELD vs. 0.611 for complications (p=0.522) at 12 months. A high MELD score and presence of complications had a similar profile of predictive accuracy and both were significant predictors of mortality at six and 12 months in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Patients with cirrhosis-related complications at presentation had a decreased survival compared with those without complications (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the occurrence of cirrhosis-related complications is a predictor of poor prognosis. While early transplantation referral is recommended, these patients do not necessarily have a higher MELD score and could be down-staged in the MELD era.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 194
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Child-Pugh versus MELD score in predicting survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
    Angermayr, B
    Cejna, M
    Karnel, F
    Gschwantler, M
    Koenig, F
    Pidlich, J
    Mendel, H
    Pichler, L
    Wichlas, M
    Kreil, A
    Schmid, M
    Ferlitsch, A
    Lipinski, E
    Brunner, H
    Lammer, J
    Ferenci, P
    Gangl, A
    Peck-Radosavljevic, M
    [J]. GUT, 2003, 52 (06) : 879 - 885
  • [2] Predicting survival among patients listed for liver transplantation: An assessment of serial MELD measurements
    Bambha, K
    Kim, WR
    Kremers, WK
    Therneau, TM
    Kamath, PS
    Wiesner, R
    Rosen, CB
    Thostenson, J
    Benson, JT
    Dickson, ER
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) : 1798 - 1804
  • [3] Brain edema and portal-systemic encephalopathy
    Blei, AT
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 6 (04) : S14 - S20
  • [4] MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European study
    Botta, F
    Giannini, E
    Romagnoli, P
    Fasoli, A
    Malfatti, F
    Testa, E
    Risso, D
    Colla, G
    Testa, R
    [J]. GUT, 2003, 52 (01) : 134 - 139
  • [5] del Olmo JA, 2000, J HEPATOL, V32, P19
  • [6] Child-Turcotte-Pugh versus MELD score as a predictor of outcome after elective and emergent surgery in cirrhotic patients
    Farnsworth, N
    Fagan, SP
    Berger, DH
    Awad, SS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (05) : 580 - 583
  • [7] Hepatic encephalopathy-definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: Final report of the working party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998
    Ferenci, P
    Lockwood, A
    Mullen, K
    Tarter, R
    Weissenborn, K
    Blei, AT
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 35 (03) : 716 - 721
  • [8] Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan
    Freeman, RB
    Wiesner, RH
    Edwards, E
    Harper, A
    Merion, R
    Wolfe, R
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [9] MELD: the holy grail of organ allocation?
    Freeman, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [10] Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD
    Freeman, RB
    Wiesner, RH
    Roberts, JP
    McDiarmid, S
    Dykstra, DM
    Merion, RM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 114 - 131