Can chemotherapy boost the survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy in early stage cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors? A population based study

被引:24
作者
Mahmoud, Omar [1 ,2 ]
Hathout, Lara [1 ]
Shaaban, Sherif G. [3 ]
Elshaikh, Mohamed A. [4 ]
Beriwal, Sushil [5 ]
Small, William, Jr. [6 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Augusta Univ, Georgia Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Augusta, GA USA
[4] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiat Oncol, Inst Canc, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Loyola Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Early stage cervical cancer; Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Adjuvant radiotherapy; Intermediate risk factors; PELVIC RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. The Gynecologic Oncology group (GOG) 0263 trial is currently exploring whether adding chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy improves recurrence-free and/or overall survival in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients with pathologic intermediate-risk factors. Using the National Cancer Data Base, we evaluated the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy over adjuvant radiotherapy alone in the community practice setting. Materials. The analysis included 869 stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy retrieving intermediate-risk factors justifying adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy were delivered in 440 and 429 patients, respectively. Chi-square test assessed the distribution of variables in each group and the overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Proportional hazard models were performed to evaluate the impact of the different prognostic factors on survival and propensity score analysis adjusted variables imbalanced distribution. Results. Adding chemotherapy to ART did not show a survival benefit at 48 months median follow-up; the 5 year overall survival was 87% and 81% (p = 0.6) in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy groups, respectively. On univariate analysis, age older than 60, a higher comorbidity score, and stage IIA were significantly associated with worse survival, while none of the other covariates were significant prognosticator on multivariate analysis. The same findings held after propensity score analysis. Conclusion. Our analysis could not detect a significant survival benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy over adjuvant radiotherapy in women with intermediate-risk factors. Until GOG 0263 results become available, the benefits of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be considered on an individual basis within a multidisciplinary approach (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 544
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
American College of Surgeons, 2016, NAT CANC DAT BAS
[2]  
[Anonymous], NAT CANC DAT BAS PAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], ESGO 15 ANN M BERL G
[4]  
[Anonymous], SURG PRINCIPLES GYNE
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT J GYNAECOL OBS S
[6]  
[Anonymous], NCCN CLIN PRACT GUID
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Miscellaneous functions for Grid Graphics R package gridExtra version 2.3
[8]   Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (25) :3083-3107
[9]   Interpreting measures of treatment effect in cancer clinical trials [J].
Case, LD ;
Kimmick, G ;
Paskett, ED ;
Lohman, K ;
Tucker, R .
ONCOLOGIST, 2002, 7 (03) :181-187
[10]   On power and sample size calculation for QT studies with recording replicates at given time point [J].
Chow, Shein-Chung ;
Cheng, Bin ;
Cosmatos, Dennis .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2008, 18 (03) :483-493