Comparison of whole-body PET/PET-CT and conventional imaging procedures for distant metastasis staging in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis

被引：0
作者：
Sun, Zhe [1 ]
Yi, Yu Li [2 ]
Liu, Yu [2 ]
Xiong, Jian Ping [1 ]
He, Chao Zhu [2 ]
机构：
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Oncol, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Coll Nursing, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
来源：
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词：
PET; Breast cancer; Distant metastasis; Meta-analysis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR RECURRENCE; FDG-PET; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; CARCINOMA; THERAPY;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号：
100214 ;
摘要：
Aim: To compare the performance of whole-body PET/PET-CT with that of conventional imaging procedures for the overall assessment of distant metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods: The authors performed a meta-analysis of all available studies of whole-body PET/PET-CT compared with conventional imaging procedures. They calculated sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using bivariate regression models for whole-body PET/PET-CT and conventional imaging procedures, respectively. Results: Across six studies (609 patients), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios, and negative likelihood ratios of whole-body PET/PET-CT were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.88-1.00), 0.95 (95% CI = 0.89-0.98), 21.1 (95% CI = 8.2-55.5), and 0.02 (95% CI = 0.001-0.13), respectively, and of conventional imaging procedures they were 0.57 (95% CI = 0.37-0.74), 0.88 (95% CI = 0.78-0.94), 4.8 (95% CI = 2.8-8.2) and 0.49 (95% CI = 0.33-0.74), respectively. Conclusion: Compared with conventional imaging procedures, whole-body PET/PET-CT had excellent diagnostic performance for distant metastasis staging in patients with breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码：672 / 676
页数：5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH
[2]   The role of FDG PET/CT in patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrence: A comparison to conventional imaging techniques [J].
Aukema, T. S. ;
Rutgers, E. J. Th. ;
Vogel, W. V. ;
Teertstra, H. J. ;
Oldenburg, H. S. ;
Peeters, M. T. F. D. Vrancken ;
Wesseling, J. ;
Russell, N. S. ;
Olmos, R. A. Valdes .
EJSO, 2010, 36 (04) :387-392
[3]   Whole-body MR imaging in 30 seconds with real-time true FISP and a continuously rolling table platform: Feasibility study [J].
Barkhausen, J ;
Quick, HH ;
Lauenstein, T ;
Goyen, M ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Laub, G ;
Debatin, JF ;
Ladd, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) :252-256
[4]   Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach [J].
Chu, Haitao ;
Cole, Stephen R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (12) :1331-1332
[5]   Comparison of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 'conventional diagnostic procedures' for the detection of distant metastases in breast cancer patients [J].
Dose, J ;
Bleckmann, C ;
Bachmann, S ;
Bohuslavizki, KH ;
Berger, J ;
Jenicke, L ;
Habermann, CR ;
Jänicke, F .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 23 (09) :857-864
[6]   Detection of metastases in breast cancer patients -: Comparison of FDG PET with chest X-ray, bone scintigraphy and ultrasound of the abdomen [J].
Dose-Schwarz, J. ;
Mahner, S. ;
Schirrmacher, S. ;
Jenicke, L. ;
Mueller, V. ;
Habermann, C. R. ;
Brenner, W. .
NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 47 (03) :97-103
[7]   Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures [J].
Fuster, David ;
Duch, Joan ;
Paredes, Pilar ;
Velasco, Martin ;
Munoz, Montserrat ;
Santamaria, Gorane ;
Fontanillas, Montserrat ;
Pons, Francesca .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (29) :4746-4751
[8]   F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma - A comparison to conventional imaging [J].
Gallowitsch, HJ ;
Kresnik, E ;
Gasser, J ;
Kumnig, G ;
Igerc, I ;
Mikosch, P ;
Lind, P .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (05) :250-256
[9]   The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan [J].
Garami, Z. ;
Hascsi, Z. ;
Varga, J. ;
Dinya, T. ;
Tanyi, M. ;
Garai, I. ;
Damjanovich, L. ;
Galuska, L. .
EJSO, 2012, 38 (01) :31-37
[10]   The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance [J].
Glas, AS ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Prins, MH ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (11) :1129-1135
123