B0 and B1 inhomogeneities in the liver at 1.5 T and 3.0 T

被引:27
|
作者
Roberts, Nathan T. [1 ,2 ]
Hinshaw, Louis A. [1 ]
Colgan, Timothy J. [1 ]
Ii, Takanori [1 ,3 ]
Hernando, Diego [1 ,4 ]
Reeder, Scott B. [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Radiol, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Radiol, Yamanashi, Japan
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Biomed Engn, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med, Madison, WI USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Emergency Med, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
B-0; B-1; dielectric effect; inhomogeneities; liver; quantitative imaging biomarkers; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; FIELD INHOMOGENEITY; FAT; WATER; T-1; QUANTIFICATION; SEPARATION; MRI; DECOMPOSITION; DISTORTION;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.28549
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this work is to characterize the magnitude and variability of B-0 and B-1 inhomogeneities in the liver in large cohorts of patients at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Methods Volumetric B-0 and B-1 maps were acquired over the liver of patients presenting for routine abdominal MRI. Regions of interest were drawn in the nine Couinaud segments of the liver, and the average value was recorded. Magnitude and variation of measured averages in each segment were reported across all patients. Results A total of 316 B-0 maps and 314 B-1 maps, acquired at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on a variety of GE Healthcare MRI systems in 630 unique exams, were identified, analyzed, and, in the interest of reproducible research, de-identified and made public. Measured B-0 inhomogeneities ranged (5th-95th percentiles) from -31.7 Hz to 164.0 Hz for 3.0 T (-14.5 Hz to 81.3 Hz at 1.5 T), while measured B-1 inhomogeneities (ratio of actual over prescribed flip angle) ranged from 0.59 to 1.13 for 3.0 T (0.83 to 1.11 at 1.5 T). Conclusion This study provides robust characterization of B-0 and B-1 inhomogeneities in the liver to guide the development of imaging applications and protocols. Field strength, bore diameter, and sex were determined to be statistically significant effects for both B-0 and B-1 uniformity. Typical clinical liver imaging at 3.0 T should expect B-0 inhomogeneities ranging from approximately -100 Hz to 250 Hz (-50 Hz to 150 Hz at 1.5 T) and B-1 inhomogeneities ranging from approximately 0.4 to 1.3 (0.7 to 1.2 at 1.5 T).
引用
收藏
页码:2212 / 2220
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver at 3.0 T: Comparison with 1.5 T
    Cui, Yong
    Dyvorne, Hadrien
    Besa, Cecilia
    Cooper, Nancy
    Taouli, Bachir
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2015, 2 : 123 - 128
  • [22] R2* mapping in the presence of macroscopic B0 field variations
    Hernando, Diego
    Vigen, Karl K.
    Shimakawa, Ann
    Reeder, Scott B.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2012, 68 (03) : 830 - 840
  • [23] Simultaneous estimation of PD, T1, T2, T2*, and ΔB0 using magnetic resonance fingerprinting with background gradient compensation
    Hong, Taehwa
    Han, Dongyeob
    Kim, Dong-Hyun
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2019, 81 (04) : 2614 - 2623
  • [24] Correction of B1 inhomogeneities using echo-planar imaging of water
    Thulborn, KR
    Boada, FE
    Shen, GX
    Christensen, JD
    Reese, TG
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1998, 39 (03) : 369 - 375
  • [25] B0 and B1-insensitive uniform T1-weighting for quantitative, first-pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging
    Kim, D
    Cernicanu, A
    Axel, L
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2005, 54 (06) : 1423 - 1429
  • [26] Postprocessing Correction for Distortions in T2* Decay Caused by Quadratic Cross-Slice B0 Inhomogeneity
    Yang, Xiangyu
    Sammet, Steffen
    Schmalbrock, Petra
    Knopp, Michael V.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2010, 63 (05) : 1258 - 1268
  • [27] Clinically feasible B1 field correction for multi-organ sodium imaging at 3 T
    Vaeggemose, Michael
    Schulte, Rolf F.
    Laustsen, Christoffer
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 36 (02)
  • [28] Liver fat volume fraction quantification with fat and water T1 and T2* estimation and accounting for NMR multiple components in patients with chronic liver disease at 1.5 and 3.0 T
    Leporq, Benjamin
    Ratiney, Helene
    Pilleul, Frank
    Beuf, Olivier
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (08) : 2175 - 2186
  • [29] Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 T and 1.5 T MR imaging of the liver in patients with diffuse parenchymal liver disease
    Tsurusaki, Masakatsu
    Semelka, Richard C.
    Zapparoli, Mauricio
    Elias, Jorge, Jr.
    Altun, Ersan
    Pamuklar, Ertan
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 72 (02) : 314 - 320
  • [30] B1 Field Correction of T1 Estimation Should Be Considered for Breast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Even at 1.5 T
    Tsai, Wan-Chen
    Kao, Kuo-Jang
    Chang, Kai-Ming
    Hung, Chen-Fang
    Yang, Qing
    Lin, Chien-Yuan E.
    Chen, Chii-Ming
    RADIOLOGY, 2017, 282 (01) : 55 - 62