Treatment outcomes of large and giant intracranial aneurysms according to various treatment modalities

被引:11
|
作者
Choi, Jai Ho [1 ]
Lee, Kwan Sung [1 ]
Kim, Bum-soo [2 ]
Shin, Yong Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 222 Banpodaero, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiol, 222 Banpodaero, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Intracranial aneurysm; Coil; Flow diverter; Clip; Parent artery occlusion; PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; FLOW-DIVERTING DEVICES; BALLOON TEST OCCLUSION; CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS; ENDOVASCULAR COILING; COMPLICATIONS; DIVERSION; EVOLUTION; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s00701-020-04540-1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of large (15-25 mm) and giant (> 25 mm) intracranial aneurysms (IAs), according to different treatment modalities. Methods In total, 112 patients with large and giant IAs treated with various treatment modalities between January 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiological parameters were analyzed and correlated with the treatment modality. Results A total of 141 procedures were performed on 112 patients. We initially treated 47 cases with coil embolization, 39 with flow diverter (FD), 13 with direct clipping, and 13 with parent artery occlusion (PAO). Recurrence (46.8%) and retreatment (31.9%) rates were significantly higher in the coiling group (p< 0.001). Complete occlusion rate (36.3%) was significantly lower in the coiling group (p= 0.027). PAO could achieve a high complete occlusion rate (90.9%) with low complication rate (12.5%). The total complication rate was 17%. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, FD (OR 3.406,p= 0.036) and direct clipping (OR 5.732,p= 0.017) showed a significantly higher complication rate than coiling. The overall mortality rate was 8% (8/139 procedures). At the last follow-up (mean 30.6 +/- 26.4 months), 70 of 96 patients (72.9%) showed complete or near-complete occlusion. Good functional outcome (mRS <= 2) was observed in 90 of 112 (80.3%) patients at the last follow-up (mean 33.2 +/- 30.5 months). Conclusions Good clinical and radiologic outcomes with acceptable complication and mortality rates can be achieved by various treatment modalities. The selection of appropriate modality should be individualized based on the angiographic findings and clinical symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:2745 / 2752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms: long-term outcomes in surgical versus endovascular management
    Santoro, Antonio
    Armocida, Daniele
    Paglia, Francesco
    Iacobucci, Marta
    Berra, Luigi Valentino
    D'Angelo, Luca
    Cirelli, Carlo
    Guidetti, Giulio
    Biraschi, Francesco
    Cantore, Giampaolo
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2022, 45 (06) : 3759 - 3770
  • [22] Challenges in the endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms
    Gonzalez, Nestor R.
    Duckwiler, Gary
    Jahan, Reza
    Murayama, Yuichi
    Vinuela, Fernando
    NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 62 (06) : 1324 - 1335
  • [23] Volume changes of extremely large and giant intracranial aneurysms after treatment with flow diverter stents
    Carneiro, Angelo
    Rane, Neil
    Kueker, Wilhelm
    Cellerini, Martino
    Corkill, Rufus
    Byrne, James V.
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2014, 56 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [24] Pipeline embolization device versus coiling for the treatment of large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Wali, Arvin R.
    Park, Charlie C.
    Santiago-Dieppa, David R.
    Vaida, Florin
    Murphy, James D.
    Khalessi, Alexander A.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2017, 42 (06)
  • [25] Treatment of Large and Giant Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Risk Factors for Unfavorable Outcomes
    Park, Wonhyoung
    Chung, Jaewoo
    Ahn, Jae Sung
    Park, Jung Cheol
    Kwun, Byung Duk
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 102 : 301 - 312
  • [26] Pipeline Embolization Device in Treatment of 50 Unruptured Large and Giant Aneurysms
    Adeeb, Nimer
    Griessenauer, Christoph J.
    Shallwani, Hussain
    Shakir, Hakeem
    Foreman, Paul M.
    Moore, Justin M.
    Dmytriw, Adam A.
    Gupta, Raghav
    Siddiqui, Adnan H.
    Levy, Elad I.
    Snyder, Kenneth
    Harrigan, Mark R.
    Ogilvy, Christopher S.
    Thomas, Ajith J.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 105 : 232 - 237
  • [27] Assessment of angiographic outcomes after flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a new grading schema
    Kamran, Mudassar
    Yarnold, Julia
    Grunwald, Iris Q.
    Byrne, James V.
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 53 (07) : 501 - 508
  • [28] Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Yue, W.
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (04) : 420 - 424
  • [29] Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Froehler, Michael T.
    CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2013, 13 (02)
  • [30] Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters
    Simgen, A.
    RADIOLOGE, 2020, 60 (04): : 303 - 309