Treatment outcomes of large and giant intracranial aneurysms according to various treatment modalities

被引:11
|
作者
Choi, Jai Ho [1 ]
Lee, Kwan Sung [1 ]
Kim, Bum-soo [2 ]
Shin, Yong Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 222 Banpodaero, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiol, 222 Banpodaero, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Intracranial aneurysm; Coil; Flow diverter; Clip; Parent artery occlusion; PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; FLOW-DIVERTING DEVICES; BALLOON TEST OCCLUSION; CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS; ENDOVASCULAR COILING; COMPLICATIONS; DIVERSION; EVOLUTION; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s00701-020-04540-1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of large (15-25 mm) and giant (> 25 mm) intracranial aneurysms (IAs), according to different treatment modalities. Methods In total, 112 patients with large and giant IAs treated with various treatment modalities between January 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiological parameters were analyzed and correlated with the treatment modality. Results A total of 141 procedures were performed on 112 patients. We initially treated 47 cases with coil embolization, 39 with flow diverter (FD), 13 with direct clipping, and 13 with parent artery occlusion (PAO). Recurrence (46.8%) and retreatment (31.9%) rates were significantly higher in the coiling group (p< 0.001). Complete occlusion rate (36.3%) was significantly lower in the coiling group (p= 0.027). PAO could achieve a high complete occlusion rate (90.9%) with low complication rate (12.5%). The total complication rate was 17%. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, FD (OR 3.406,p= 0.036) and direct clipping (OR 5.732,p= 0.017) showed a significantly higher complication rate than coiling. The overall mortality rate was 8% (8/139 procedures). At the last follow-up (mean 30.6 +/- 26.4 months), 70 of 96 patients (72.9%) showed complete or near-complete occlusion. Good functional outcome (mRS <= 2) was observed in 90 of 112 (80.3%) patients at the last follow-up (mean 33.2 +/- 30.5 months). Conclusions Good clinical and radiologic outcomes with acceptable complication and mortality rates can be achieved by various treatment modalities. The selection of appropriate modality should be individualized based on the angiographic findings and clinical symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:2745 / 2752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment outcomes of large and giant intracranial aneurysms according to various treatment modalities
    Jai Ho Choi
    Kwan Sung Lee
    Bum-soo Kim
    Yong Sam Shin
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2020, 162 : 2745 - 2752
  • [2] Endovascular Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysms
    Linfante, Italo
    Andreone, Vincenzo
    Ravelo, Natalia
    Starosciak, Amy K.
    Arif, Bilal
    Shallwani, Hussain
    Kan, Peter Tze Man
    McDermott, Michael W.
    Dabus, Guilherme
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [3] A Single Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device for the Treatment of Large and Giant Anterior Circulation Intracranial Aneurysms
    Choi, Jai Ho
    Sim, Sook Young
    Shin, Yong Sam
    Chung, Joonho
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 63 (04) : 349 - 356
  • [4] Hemodynamic Effect of Flow Diverter and Coils in Treatment of Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms
    Jing, Linkai
    Zhong, Jingru
    Liu, Jian
    Yang, Xinjian
    Paliwal, Nikhil
    Meng, Hui
    Wang, Shengzhang
    Zhang, Ying
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 89 : 199 - 207
  • [5] Endovascular treatment of giant or very large intracranial aneurysms with different modalities: an analysis of 20 cases
    Li, Ming-Hua
    Li, Yong-Dong
    Fang, Chun
    Gu, Bing-Xian
    Cheng, Ying-Sheng
    Wang, Yong-Li
    Gao, Bu-Lang
    Zhao, Jun-Gong
    Wang, Ju
    Li, Min
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (10) : 819 - 828
  • [6] Endovascular treatment of giant or very large intracranial aneurysms with different modalities: an analysis of 20 cases
    Ming-Hua Li
    Yong-Dong Li
    Chun Fang
    Bing-Xian Gu
    Ying-Sheng Cheng
    Yong-Li Wang
    Bu-Lang Gao
    Jun-Gong Zhao
    Ju Wang
    Min Li
    Neuroradiology, 2007, 49 : 819 - 828
  • [7] Endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms
    Bracard, S.
    Derelle, A. L.
    Tonnelet, R.
    Barbier, C.
    Proust, F.
    Anxionnat, R.
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2016, 62 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [8] Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysms
    Lv, X.
    Jiang, C.
    Li, Y.
    Yang, X.
    Zhang, J.
    Wu, Z.
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2009, 15 (02) : 135 - 144
  • [9] Outcomes of treatment modalities for ruptured intracranial aneurysms based on age - A meta-analysis
    Dawod, Giana
    Henkel, Nicholas D.
    Salahuddin, Hisham
    Castonguay, Alicia C.
    Koneru, Sitara
    Mugge, Luke
    Khuder, Sadik A.
    Medhkour, Azedine
    Jumma, Mouhammad A.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 29 (09)
  • [10] Treatment of Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: Cost Comparison of Flow Diversion and Traditional Embolization Strategies
    el-Chalouhi, Nohra
    Jabbour, Pascal M.
    Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula I.
    Starke, Robert M.
    Dumont, Aaron S.
    Liu, Haisong
    Rosenwasser, Robert
    El Moursi, Sedeek
    Gonzalez, L. Fernando
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (05) : 696 - 701