Differences in diabetes control in telemedicine vs. in-person only visits in ambulatory care setting

被引:6
|
作者
Kubes, Julianne N. [1 ]
Jones, Laura [2 ]
Hassan, Saria [3 ,4 ]
Franks, Nicole [5 ]
Wiley, Zanthia [6 ]
Kulshreshtha, Ambar [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Emory Healthcare, Off Qual & Risk, 478 We Peachtree St NW, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Emory Healthcare, Phys Grp Pract, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Emory Univ, Div Primary Care Med, Sch Med, 1365 Clifton Rd Suite 1400, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Emory Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Sch Med, 201 Dowman Dr, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Emory Univ, Hosp Midtown, Div Infect Dis, Sch Med, Med Off Tower 7th Floor, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Emory Univ, Div Family & Preventat Med, Sch Med, 201 Dowman Dr, Atlanta, GA USA
[8] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA USA
[9] Emory Univ, Emory Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Family & Prevent Med, Dept Epidemiol,Sch Med, 4500 North Shallowford Rd,Suite 134, Atlanta, GA 30338 USA
关键词
Telemedicine; Telehealth; Diabetes; Patient safety; Quality improvement;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
There is limited information regarding how telemedicine visits compare with in-person visits regarding diabetes outcomes in an ambulatory care setting. Our objective was to compare proportions of patients in ambulatory setting with uncontrolled diabetes among those with telemedicine visits versus in-person only visits and examine differences by age, race, gender, ethnicity, and insurance status. Adults with diabetes who attended an ambu-latory primary or specialty clinic visit between May 2020 and May 2021 were included. Demographics including age, race, ethnicity, gender, insurance, and comorbidities were extracted from the electronic medical record. Patients were compared among three visit groups: those with in-person only visits, those with only one tele -medicine visit, and those with 2 + telemedicine visits. The primary outcome was uncontrolled diabetes, defined as HbA1c >= 9.0 %. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess differences in uncontrolled diabetes between visit groups following risk adjustment. A total of 18,148 patients met inclusion criteria and 2,101 (11.6 %) had uncontrolled diabetes. There was no difference in proportion of patients with uncontrolled diabetes between visit groups (in-person only visits: 834 (11.6 %); one telemedicine visit: 558 (11.8 %); 2 + telemedicine visits: 709 (11.4 %); p = 0.80)). Patients with 2 + telemedicine visits had significantly lower odds of uncontrolled diabetes compared to in-person only visits after risk adjustment (OR: 0.88; 95 % CI: 0.79-0.99, p = 0.03). Compared with in-person ambulatory visits, telemedicine visits were associated with a lower odds of uncon-trolled diabetes. Further work is warranted to explore the relationship between telemedicine visits and diabetes outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [31] Insulin tolerance test predicts non response vs. sustained efficacy of Liraglutide on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients: A prospective real-world setting study
    Germain, Natacha
    Khalfallah, Yadh
    Estour, Bruno
    Galusca, Bogdan
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 137 : 20 - 27
  • [32] Metabolic control, healthcare satisfaction and costs 1 month after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial of hospital-based care vs. hospital-based home care
    Tiberg, Iren
    Carlsson, Katarina Steen
    Carlsson, Annelie
    Hallstrom, Inger
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2012, 13 (08) : 625 - 631