共 50 条
Private market impact investing firms: Ownership structure and investment style
被引:6
作者:
Cojoianu, Theodor F.
[1
,2
,3
]
Hoepner, Andreas G. F.
[2
,4
,5
,6
]
Lin, Yanan
[7
]
机构:
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Business Sch, 29 Buccleuch PI, Edinburgh EH8 9JS, Scotland
[2] European Commiss Tech Expert Grp Sustainable Finan, Brussels, Belgium
[3] HM Treasury, Green Tech Advisory Grp, London, England
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Michael Smurfit Grad Business Sch, Carysfort Ave, Blackrock, Co Dublin, Ireland
[5] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Lochlann Quinn Sch Business, Carysfort Ave, Blackrock, Co Dublin, Ireland
[6] SFI Ctr Res Training Machine Learning, ML Labs, Dublin, Ireland
[7] China Europe Int Business Sch, 699 Hongfeng Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金:
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词:
Impact investment;
Private equity;
Sustainable finance;
CORPORATE;
PERFORMANCE;
GOVERNMENT;
COST;
D O I:
10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102374
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
Impact investing and ESG investing are specific "ethical" investing types integrating social, environmental, and moral values with financial goals. Despite receiving heightened scholarly attention, the difference between impact and ESG investing is largely unexamined, and it is not clear how they differ from conventional investment. To explain the differences between ESG, impact, and conventional investing, this paper draws on a dataset of over 8000 private market investment (PMI) firms. It compares impact, ESG, and conventional investment across firm characteristics, investment preference, and ownership. Results show that impact investors are more likely to be owned by the government, focusing on agriculture, cleantech, and education while avoiding "sin" industries like gambling and tobacco.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文