Evaluating the Impact of Central Venous Catheter Materials and Design on Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:7
作者
Slaughter, Eugene [1 ,2 ]
Kynoch, Kathryn [3 ]
Brodribb, Megan [4 ]
Keogh, Samantha J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Nursing, Victoria Pk Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Alliance Vasc Access Teaching & Res Grp AVATAR, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Mater Hlth Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Lib Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
antithrombogenic catheter; central venous catheter; peripherally inserted central catheters; thrombosis; INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER; RISK-FACTORS; THROMBOEMBOLISM; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PICC;
D O I
10.1111/wvn.12472
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background Thrombosis is a common complication associated with central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. Several antithrombogenic materials and alterations to catheter design have been developed to lower thrombosis rates. Aim To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of antithrombogenic materials and alterations to CVC design on thrombosis rates. Methods A systematic search was completed of main databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed) as well as trial registries and gray literature. Randomized controlled trials conducted in any age group, published in English language since 2008 reporting impact of different CVC designs or materials on thrombosis were included, to capture studies that reflect contemporary products and practice. Cochrane systematic review methodology was followed, including independent study selection and data extraction. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis in RevMan were conducted. Results From a possible 232 studies, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Four studies (n = 1,320) assessed different catheter materials; four studies (n = 591) compared different CVC designs, and one study (n = 150) evaluated impact of combined design and material on outcomes. Meta-analysis demonstrated that neither catheter material nor design alone or in combination had a significant impact on thrombosis (RR: 0.98 [95% CI 0.87, 1.11]). Different catheter materials and design also had no significant impact on occlusion or CRBSI. Studies were of mixed quality overall. Linking Evidence to Action Different CVC materials and designs were not associated with a reduction in the risk of either catheter-related thrombosis or infection. Overall reporting and small sample sizes make it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Larger, quality randomized trials are required to provide evidence about the possible merits of innovative catheter design and materials on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 384
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheter vs conventional central venous catheters in hematological cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ge, Weilei
    Zheng, Chen
    HEMATOLOGY, 2025, 30 (01)
  • [12] Risk Factors for Central Venous Access Device-Related Thrombosis in Hospitalized Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tian, Lingyun
    Li, Wan
    Su, Yanan
    Gao, Huimin
    Yang, Qiuhong
    Lin, Pan
    Wang, Liqian
    Zeng, Jiaqi
    Li, Yinglan
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2021, 121 (05) : 625 - 640
  • [13] Catheter salvage strategies in children with central venous catheter-related or -associated bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buonsenso, D.
    Salerno, G.
    Sodero, G.
    Mariani, F.
    Pisapia, L.
    Gelormini, C.
    Di Nardo, M.
    Valentini, P.
    Scoppettuolo, G.
    Biasucci, D. G.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2022, 125 : 1 - 20
  • [14] Influencing factors of neonatal peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC)-related phlebitis: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis
    Li, Xia
    Guo, Xuemei
    Wan, Xingli
    Hu, Yanling
    SIGNA VITAE, 2023, 19 (02) : 1 - 11
  • [15] Improving central venous catheter care with chlorhexidine gluconate dressings: evidence from a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Xu, Huilin
    Zhu, Min
    Xu, Shenghong
    Bian, Lanzheng
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POPULATION AND NUTRITION, 2024, 43 (01)
  • [16] Risk of Venous Thrombosis in Antithrombin Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-analysis
    Croles, F. Nanne
    Borjas-Howard, Jaime
    Nasserinejad, Kazem
    Leebeek, Frank W. G.
    Meijer, Karina
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2018, 44 (04) : 315 - 326
  • [17] Insertion site of central venous catheter among hospitalized adult patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Sakuraya, Masaaki
    Okano, Hiromu
    Yoshihiro, Shodai
    Niida, Shoko
    Kimura, Keina
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [18] Efficacy and safety of primary thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and a central venous catheter: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Allen
    Brandt, Willem
    Brown, Cameron
    Wang, Tzu-Fei
    Ikesaka, Rick
    Delluc, Aurelien
    Wells, Phil
    Carrier, Marc
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2021, 208 : 58 - 65
  • [19] Prognostic factors for venous thrombosis in patients with peripherally inserted central catheters Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gao, Yanling
    Fan, Xiaoyi
    Han, Jie
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (28) : E21037
  • [20] Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Smit, Jasper M.
    Raadsen, Reinder
    Blans, Michiel J.
    Petjak, Manfred
    Van de Ven, Peter M.
    Tuinman, Pieter R.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 22