Quantum limits to optical point-source localization

被引:56
作者
Tsang, Mankei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Singapore 117583, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Phys, Singapore 117551, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
SINGLE-MOLECULE MICROSCOPY; ENHANCED METROLOGY; DIFFRACTION LIMIT; EVANESCENT WAVES; RESOLUTION; SUPERRESOLUTION; FIELD; DISPLACEMENTS; LITHOGRAPHY; PROBES;
D O I
10.1364/OPTICA.2.000646
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Motivated by the importance of optical microscopes to science and engineering, scientists have pondered for centuries how to improve their resolution and the existence of fundamental resolution limits. In recent years, a new class of microscopes that overcome a long-held belief about the resolution have revolutionized biological imaging. Termed "super-resolution" microscopy, these techniques work by accurately locating optical point sources from far field. To investigate the fundamental localization limits, here I derive quantum lower bounds on the error of locating point sources in free space, taking full account of the quantum, nonparaxial, and vectoral nature of photons. These bounds are valid for any measurement technique, as long as it obeys quantum mechanics, and serve as general no-go theorems for the resolution of microscopes. To arrive at analytic results, I focus mainly on the cases of one and two classical monochromatic sources with an initial vacuum optical state. For one source, a lower bound on the root-mean-square position estimation error is of the order of lambda(0)/root N, where lambda(0) is the free-space wavelength and N is the average number of radiated photons. For two sources, owing to the statistical effect of nuisance parameters, the error bound diverges when their radiated fields overlap significantly. The use of squeezed light to further enhance the accuracy of locating one classical point source and the localization limits for partially coherent sources and single-photon sources are also discussed. The theory presented establishes a rigorous quantum statistical inference framework for the study of super-resolution microscopy and points to the possibility of using quantum techniques for true resolution enhancement. (C) 2015 Optical Society of America
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 653
页数:8
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Bayesian Bounds for Parameter Estimation and Nonlinear Filtering/Tracking, DOI DOI 10.1109/9780470544198.CH39
[2]   Ultimate quantum limits for resolution of beam displacements [J].
Barnett, SM ;
Fabre, C ;
Maître, A .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL D, 2003, 22 (03) :513-519
[3]  
Berry D. W., 2014, ARXIV14097877
[4]   Evolution of quantum superoscillations and optical superresolution without evanescent waves [J].
Berry, MV ;
Popescu, S .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 2006, 39 (22) :6965-6977
[5]   Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution [J].
Betzig, Eric ;
Patterson, George H. ;
Sougrat, Rachid ;
Lindwasser, O. Wolf ;
Olenych, Scott ;
Bonifacino, Juan S. ;
Davidson, Michael W. ;
Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer ;
Hess, Harald F. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5793) :1642-1645
[6]   POSITION MEASUREMENT WITH A RESOLUTION AND NOISE-LIMITED INSTRUMENT [J].
BOBROFF, N .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1986, 57 (06) :1152-1157
[7]  
Born M., 1999, Principles of optics-electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light, V7
[8]   Quantum interferometric optical lithography: Exploiting entanglement to beat the diffraction limit [J].
Boto, AN ;
Kok, P ;
Abrams, DS ;
Braunstein, SL ;
Williams, CP ;
Dowling, JP .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 85 (13) :2733-2736
[9]   Quantum lithography: status of the field [J].
Boyd, Robert W. ;
Dowling, Jonathan P. .
QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2012, 11 (04) :891-901
[10]   Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance [J].
Braunstein, SL ;
Caves, CM ;
Milburn, GJ .
ANNALS OF PHYSICS, 1996, 247 (01) :135-173