A Performance Study of Various Mobility Speed on AODV Routing Protocol in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous MANET

被引:0
作者
Ismail, Zahian [1 ]
Hassan, Rosilah [2 ]
机构
[1] Kolej Univ Insaniah, Kuliyyah Informat Sci & Technol, Alor Setar, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Sch Informat Sci & Technol, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
来源
17TH ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (APCC 2011) | 2011年
关键词
components; Homogeneous MANET; Heterogeneous MANET; Mobility Speed; AODV; Throughput and PDR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is a dynamic network without fixed infrastructure due to their wireless nature and can be deployed as multi-hop packet networks. It is a wireless network and has dynamic topology due to its node mobility. Networks are being used in various areas and the demand of users nowadays has motivated the emergence of the heterogeneous MANET. Compared to homogeneous MANET, heterogeneous MANET is more open to other types of network for example wireless LAN, cellular network and fixed network. In MANET, the concern is more to configuration and one of the important elements in configuration is routing. Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) is one of the routing protocols in MANET which can compromise with MANET characteristics. The aim of this research is to assess the performance of AODV in different mobility speed for homogeneous MANET and heterogeneous MANET through the simulation method. The simulation scenarios derived from the HetMAN architecture (as been discussed in previous work) have been developed in the OMNeT++ network simulator. The results achieved from the test have been evaluated using the metrics assigned; throughput and packet delivery ratio (PDR). The tests show that, as the speed increase, the throughput and PDR decrease for both homogeneous and heterogeneous MANET. From the test also, we can conclude that the performance in homogeneous MANET is better than in heterogeneous MANET.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 642
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Amri H.A., 2007, INT C SIGN PROC COMM
[2]  
Harri J., 2007, EURECOMM SEMINAR SER, V2007, P1
[3]  
Hashmi Sarosh, 2008, 2008 Second International Conference on Emerging Security Information, Systems and Technologies (SECUREWARE), P120, DOI 10.1109/SECURWARE.2008.68
[4]  
Ismail Zahian, 2010, Journal of Computer Sciences, V6, P830, DOI 10.3844/jcssp.2010.830.837
[5]  
Ismail Zahian, 2009, 2009 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI 2009), P412, DOI 10.1109/ICEEI.2009.5254703
[6]  
Ismail Z., 2009, 5 NAT C PROGR SCI 20
[7]  
Malany A. B., 2009, INT J OPEN PROBLEMS, V2, P461
[8]  
Mittal Shaily, 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, & Telecommunication Technologies (ACT 2009), P165, DOI 10.1109/ACT.2009.50
[9]   Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks [J].
Perkins, CE ;
Royer, EM ;
Das, SR ;
Marina, MK .
IEEE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2001, 8 (01) :16-28
[10]  
Ramakrishnan M., 2007, IEEE ICSCN 2007 22 2, P41