Gleason pattern 5 is the strongest pathologic predictor of recurrence, metastasis, and prostate cancer-specific death in patients receiving salvage radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy

被引:44
作者
Jackson, William [1 ]
Hamstra, Daniel A. [1 ]
Johnson, Skyler [1 ]
Zhou, Jessica [1 ]
Foster, Benjamin [1 ]
Foster, Corey [1 ]
Li, Darren [1 ]
Song, Yeohan [1 ]
Palapattu, Ganesh S. [2 ]
Kunju, Lakshmi P. [3 ]
Mehra, Rohit [3 ]
Feng, Felix Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Pathol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Gleason pattern; prostate cancer; salvage radiation therapy; outcomes; prognosis; BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; PROGRESSION; MORTALITY; INTERVAL; SCORE;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.28215
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The presence of Gleason pattern 5 (GP5) at radical prostatectomy (RP) has been associated with worse clinical outcome; however, this pathologic variable has not been assessed in patients receiving salvage radiation therapy (SRT) after a rising prostate-specific antigen level. METHODS A total of 575 patients who underwent primary RP for localized prostate cancer and subsequently received SRT at a tertiary medical institution were reviewed retrospectively. Primary outcomes of interest were biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), which were assessed via univariate analysis and Fine and Grays competing risks multivariate models. RESULTS On pathologic evaluation, 563 (98%) patients had a documented Gleason score (GS). The median follow-up post-SRT was 56.7 months. A total of 60 (10.7%) patients had primary, secondary, or tertiary GP5. On univariate analysis, the presence of GP5 was prognostic for BF (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3; P<.0001), DM (HR:11.1, P<.0001), and PCSM (HR:8.8, P<.0001). Restratification of the Gleason score to include GP5 as a distinct entity resulted in improved prognostic capability. Patients with GP5 had clinically worse outcomes than patients with GS8(4+4). On multivariate analysis, the presence of GP5 was the most adverse pathologic predictor of BF (HR 2.9; P<.0001), DM (HR 14.8; P<.0001), and PCSM (HR 5.7; P<.0001). CONCLUSION In the setting of SRT for prostate cancer, the presence of GP5 is a critical pathologic predictor of BF, DM, and PCSM. Traditional GS risk stratification fails to fully utilize the prognostic capabilities of individual Gleason patterns among men receiving SRT post-RP. Cancer 2013;119:3287-94. (c) 2013 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3287 / 3294
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Adjuvant vs Salvage Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy [J].
MacDuffie, Emily ;
D'Amico, Anthony V. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (08) :1165-1166
[42]   Castration-resistant prostate cancer without metastasis at presentation may achieve cancer-specific survival in patients who underwent prior radical prostatectomy [J].
Kodama, Hirotake ;
Koie, Takuya ;
Oikawa, Masaaki ;
Narita, Takuma ;
Tanaka, Toshikazu ;
Noro, Daisuke ;
Iwamura, Hiromichi ;
Tobisawa, Yuki ;
Yoneyama, Tohru ;
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro ;
Ohyama, Chikara .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 52 (04) :671-679
[43]   The Impact of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy on Cancer-Specific Mortality for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Analysis of an Other-Cause Mortality Matched Cohort [J].
Finati, Marco ;
Corsi, Nicholas James ;
Stephens, Alex ;
Chiarelli, Giuseppe ;
Cirulli, Giuseppe Ottone ;
Davis, Matthew ;
Tinsley, Shane ;
Sood, Akshay ;
Buffi, Nicolo ;
Lughezzani, Giovanni ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Bettocchi, Carlo ;
Carrieri, Giuseppe ;
Rogers, Craig ;
Abdollah, Firas .
CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2024, 22 (06)
[44]   Prostate-specific antigen doubling time subsequent to radical prostatectomy is a predictor of outcome following salvage external beam radiation therapy: A single-centre experience [J].
Servoll, Einar ;
Saeter, Thorstein ;
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ;
Nesland, Jahn M. ;
Waaler, Gudmund ;
Axcrona, Karol .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 49 (03) :218-223
[45]   A 10-gene signature as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and a Gleason score ≥7 [J].
Wu, Xiangkun ;
Lv, Daojun ;
Lei, Ming ;
Cai, Chao ;
Zhao, Zhijian ;
Eftekhar, Md ;
Gu, Di ;
Liu, Yongda .
ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 20 (03) :2906-2918
[46]   Long-term outcomes of salvage transurethral high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy for anastomotic recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: A retrospective analysis [J].
Watanabe, Kenta ;
Kamitani, Nobuhiko ;
Ikeda, Naoki ;
Kawata, Yujiro ;
Tokiya, Ryoji ;
Hayashi, Takafumi ;
Miyaji, Yoshiyuki ;
Tamada, Tsutomu ;
Katsui, Kuniaki .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2024, 23 (02) :179-187
[47]   The Effect of Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor on Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer [J].
Chung, Jae-Wook ;
Kim, Jin Woo ;
Ha, Yun-Sok ;
Choi, Seock Hwan ;
Lee, Jun Nyung ;
Kim, Bum Soo ;
Kim, Hyun Tae ;
Yoo, Eun Sang ;
Kwon, Tae Gyun ;
Kim, Tae-Hwan .
UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (03) :255-259
[48]   ADJUVANT RADIATION-THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH DETECTABLE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY [J].
LINK, P ;
FREIHA, FS ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (03) :532-534
[49]   Utilization of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy for Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer Before and After USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in 2012 [J].
Mcginnis, H. Scott ;
Corriher, Taylor ;
Janopaul-Naylor, James ;
Goyal, Subir ;
Liu, Yuan ;
Wang, Zelin ;
Patel, Sagar A. .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (03)
[50]   The preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is not a marker of prostate cancer characteristics but is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence in patients receiving radical prostatectomy [J].
Cao, Zhi ;
Ji, Jin ;
Zhang, Chao ;
Wang, Fubo ;
Xu, Huan ;
Yu, Yongwei ;
Sun, Yinghao .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (03) :1004-1012