Managing morning commute traffic with parking

被引:111
作者
Qian, Zhen [1 ]
Xiao, Feng [2 ]
Zhang, H. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] SW Jiaotong Univ, Coll Traff & Transportat, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Sch Transportat Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Dynamic traffic assignment; Parking; Morning commute; System optimum; CONGESTION; ECONOMICS; POLICIES; DEMAND; CHOICE; CITY; FEES;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2012.01.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate how parking fee and parking supply can be designed to mitigate traffic congestion, and to reduce total social costs. Vickrey's morning commute model is extended to incorporate travelers' choices between two parking areas (clusters). We first derive the travel patterns under different parking capacities, parking fees and accessibility to the destination; then perform a sensitivity analysis to reveal the effect of each factor on network performance and travel profiles. Some interesting findings are: (1) enlarging the central parking lots is not always desirable; (2) parking fee and capacity should be set in a way that commuters prefer to park in the farther area during early arrival; and (3) a shorter access time always reduces the social costs. Finally, we derive the optimal parking fees, capacities and access times which altogether yield the minimum total social costs. When the closer parking cluster does not have too large an accessibility advantage over the farther one, the optimal travel profile is such that both parking clusters are utilized. As a result, the optimal parking solution can effectively reduce both the social costs and the queuing delay. Even more intriguing is that, compared to the case without parking choices, all travelers are better off under the optimal parking solution, which cannot be achieved by only imposing a system-optimal dynamic toll. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 916
页数:23
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The economics of pricing parking [J].
Anderson, SP ;
de Palma, A .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2004, 55 (01) :1-20
[2]   Modeling parking [J].
Arnott, R ;
Rowse, J .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1999, 45 (01) :97-124
[3]   DEPARTURE TIME AND ROUTE CHOICE FOR THE MORNING COMMUTE [J].
ARNOTT, R ;
DEPALMA, A ;
LINDSEY, R .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1990, 24 (03) :209-228
[4]   A TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL EQUILIBRIUM-ANALYSIS OF COMMUTER PARKING [J].
ARNOTT, R ;
DEPALMA, A ;
LINDSEY, R .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1991, 45 (03) :301-335
[5]   A STOCHASTIC USER EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT MODEL FOR THE EVALUATION OF PARKING POLICIES [J].
BIFULCO, GN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 71 (02) :269-287
[6]   PARKING FEES AND CONGESTION [J].
GLAZER, A ;
NISKANEN, E .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1992, 22 (01) :123-132
[7]   Integrating parking behaviour in activity-based travel demand modelling: Investigation of the relationship between parking type choice and activity scheduling process [J].
Habib, Khandker M. Nurul ;
Morency, Catherine ;
Trepanier, Martin .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (01) :154-166
[8]   Understanding the demand for access information [J].
Thompson, RG ;
Takada, K ;
Kobayakawa, S .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 1998, 6 (04) :231-245
[9]   Empirical evidence on cruising for parking [J].
van Ommeren, Jos N. ;
Wentink, Derk ;
Rietveld, Piet .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (01) :123-130
[10]   THE ECONOMICS OF REGULATORY PARKING POLICIES - THE (IM)POSSIBILITIES OF PARKING POLICIES IN TRAFFIC REGULATION [J].
VERHOEF, E ;
NIJKAMP, P ;
RIETVELD, P .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1995, 29 (02) :141-156