Public values for badgers, bovine TB reduction and management strategies

被引:12
作者
Bennett, Richard M. [1 ]
Willis, Ken G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Agr & Food Econ, Reading RG6 2AH, Berks, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Ctr Res Environm Appraisal & Management, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
bovine TB; badgers; willingness to pay; choice experiment;
D O I
10.1080/09640560802116996
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper applies an attribute-based stated choice experiment approach to estimate the value that society places on changes to the size of the badger population in England and Wales. The study was undertaken in the context of a rising incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle and the government's review of current bTB control policy. This review includes consideration of culling badgers to reduce bTB in cattle, since badgers are thought to be an important wildlife reservoir for the disease. The design of the CE involved four attributes (size of badger population, cattle slaughtered due to bTB, badger management strategy and household tax) at four levels with eight choice sets of two alternatives presented to respondents. Telephone interviews were undertaken with over 400 respondents, which elicited their attitudes and preferences concerning badgers, bTB in cattle and badger management strategies. The study estimated a willingness to pay of 0.10 pound per household per year per 100,000 badgers and 1.52 pound per household per year per 10,000 cattle slaughtered due to bTB which aggregated to 22 per badger and 3298 pound per bTB slaughtered animal for all households in England and Wales. Management strategy toward badgers had a very high valuation, highlighting the emotive issue of badger culling for respondents and the importance of government policy towards badgers.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 523
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Adamowicz V, 2001, FUTURE DIRECTIONS ST
[2]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[3]  
Bennett J., 2001, CHOICE MODELLING APP
[4]   Comparing choice question formats for evaluating natural resource tradeoffs [J].
Breffle, WS ;
Rowe, RD .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2002, 78 (02) :298-314
[5]  
Browne Juanita, 2005, P1
[6]  
Dillman D.A., 1978, Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method
[7]  
Dillman DA., 2000, Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method
[8]   Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle [J].
Donnelly, CA ;
Woodroffe, R ;
Cox, DR ;
Bourne, FJ ;
Cheeseman, CL ;
Clifton-Hadley, RS ;
Wei, G ;
Gettinby, G ;
Gilks, P ;
Jenkins, H ;
Johnston, WT ;
Le Fevre, AM ;
McInerney, JP ;
Morrison, WI .
NATURE, 2006, 439 (7078) :843-846
[9]   Testing for consistency in contingent ranking experiments [J].
Foster, V ;
Mourato, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 44 (02) :309-328
[10]  
Garrod G., 1999, EC VALUATION ENV MET