The Political Economy of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Does Performance on the SDGs Affect Re-Election?

被引:1
作者
Kroll, Christian [1 ]
Zipperer, Vera [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] SDG Index & Dashboards, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Tech Univ, Fac Econ & Management, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[3] DIW Berlin, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
sustainable development goals; sustainability; voting behavior; re-election; political economy; economic voting; gender equality;
D O I
10.3390/su12166445
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While the economic voting hypothesis is a well-researched approach to explain behavior at the ballot box, a broader perspective of economic, social and environmental issues regarding a government's chances to get re-elected is still missing in the literature. In this context, this paper makes use for the first time of the Agenda 2030 with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as the comprehensive policy framework that all 193 UN member states have pledged to achieve. The objective of our study is therefore to examine the relationship between SDGs' progress and the likelihood of re-election. Our analysis of 124 countries regarding performance on the SDGs over time and voting behavior shows: the chance to get re-elected as a government significantly increases for progress made towards SDG 5 (Gender Equality). Notable differences are also found for high-income vs. low-income countries. The fact that governments are rewarded at the ballot box for successful action towards gender equality is encouraging, while the mechanisms behind other SDG areas deserve more research.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   How Lasting Is Voter Gratitude? An Analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Electoral Returns to Beneficial Policy [J].
Bechtel, Michael M. ;
Hainmueller, Jens .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 55 (04) :851-867
[2]   Income inequality and election outcomes in OECD countries: New evidence following the Great Recession of 2008-2009 [J].
Bouvet, Florence ;
King, Sharmila .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2016, 41 :70-79
[3]   Trying not to lose: The electoral consequences of unilateral reform efforts and the social pact formation process [J].
Castater, Eric Graig ;
Han, Kyung Joon .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 57 (01) :171-193
[4]  
Cruz C., 2018, Database of Political Institutions 2017 (DPI2017)
[5]   AN ECONOMIC-THEORY OF POLITICAL-ACTION IN A DEMOCRACY [J].
DOWNS, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1957, 65 (02) :135-150
[6]  
Fiorina MorrisP., 1981, RETROSPECTIVE VOTING
[7]   Sharing the Rewards, Dividing the Costs? The Electoral Consequences of Social Pacts and Legislative Reform in Western Europe [J].
Hamann, Kerstin ;
Johnston, Alison ;
Katsanidou, Alexia ;
Kelly, John ;
Pollock, Philip H. .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2015, 38 (01) :206-227
[8]  
Hibbs D., 2006, The Oxford Handbook Of Political Economy
[9]   The electoral cost of war: Iraq casualties and the 2004 US Presidential Election [J].
Karol, David ;
Miguel, Edward .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2007, 69 (03) :633-648
[10]  
Key V.O., 1966, The responsible electorate: rationality in presidential voting, 1936-1960, Volume 1966