Suggested Excisional Margins for Cutaneous Malignant Lesions Based on Mohs Micrographic Surgery

被引:54
作者
Schell, Amy E. [1 ]
Russell, Mark A. [2 ]
Park, Stephen S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Dermatol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA; SURGICAL EXCISION; FACE;
D O I
10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Surgical excision of skin cancer is a common treatment, yet the proper surgical margin remains unclear. This study reviews data on lesions and their margins as defined by Mohs micrographic surgery. OBJECTIVE To review margins as defined by Mohs micrographic surgery. DESIGN Retrospective review of data from patients with skin cancer. SETTING Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS All patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE Size and final defect size were compared to calculate the margins needed. All lesions were categorized based on histologic characteristics. RESULTS A total of 495 lesions were reviewed. All tumors and defects had precise measurements. The mean margins for low-risk basal cell carcinomas, high-risk basal cell carcinomas, low-risk squamous cell carcinomas, and high-risk squamous cell carcinomas were 2.4 mm, 3.7 mm, 2.6 mm, and 5.3 mm, respectively. Statistical differences in surgical margins were found between all low-and high-risk cancer types. Established high-risk zones (H-zone) for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma were not associated with larger margins. Margins required to excise completely 95% of all the low-risk basal cell carcinomas, high-risk basal cell carcinomas, low-risk squamous cell carcinomas, and high-risk squamous cell carcinomas, were 4.75 mm, 8 mm, 5 mm, and 13.25 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Differences are noted between low-and high-risk cutaneous lesions. When primary excision instead of Mohs micrographic surgery is the only option, the aforementioned margins may be considered guidelines. The relevance of this study is to guide future management and margins for primary excision.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 343
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bentkover Stuart H, 2002, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V4, P114, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.4.2.114
[2]   Analysis of risk factor's determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma:: a prospective study [J].
Brantsch, Kay D. ;
Meisner, Christoph ;
Schoenfisch, Birgitt ;
Trilling, Birgit ;
Wehner-Caroli, Joerg ;
Roecken, Martin ;
Breuninger, Helmut .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2008, 9 (08) :713-720
[3]   SURGICAL MARGINS FOR EXCISION OF PRIMARY CUTANEOUS SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
BRODLAND, DG ;
ZITELLI, JA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1992, 27 (02) :241-248
[4]   Basal cell carcinoma: biology, morphology and clinical implications [J].
Crowson, AN .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 :S127-S147
[5]  
Cumberland Lara, 2009, Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, V17, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.fsc.2009.06.001
[6]   MOHS MICROGRAPHIC SURGERY FOR SKIN-CANCER [J].
DINEHART, SM ;
POLLACK, SV .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 1989, 16 (04) :257-265
[7]   HOW ACCURATE IS VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF BASAL CARCINOMA MARGINS [J].
EPSTEIN, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1973, 89 (01) :37-43
[8]   Neoplasms of the Facial Skin [J].
Hajdarbegovic, E. ;
van der Leest, R. J. T. ;
Munte, K. ;
Thio, H. B. ;
Neumann, H. A. M. .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 36 (03) :319-+
[9]   Color-specific enhancement of digital photographs for identification of the extent of cutaneous malignancy [J].
Krein, HD ;
Greenbaum, SS ;
Reiter, D .
ARCHIVES OF FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 7 (02) :135-137
[10]  
Lee David A, 2009, Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, V17, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.fsc.2009.04.004