THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION POLICY TOWARDS THE LICENSING OF STANDARD-ESSENTIAL PATENTS: WHERE DO WE STAND?

被引:7
作者
Geradin, Damien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Covington & Burling LLP, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Tilburg Univ, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] George Mason Univ, Sch Law, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
K21; K41; L40;
D O I
10.1093/joclec/nht036
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Defining the circumstances in which the licensing conduct or litigation strategy of a standard-essential patent (SEP) holder amounts to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of Article 102 of the Treaty has been one of the most intractable issues for the European Commission given the significance of the interests at stake and the diversity of opinions among stakeholders. Although the Commission has spent most of the past ten years investigating alleged abuses committed by SEP holders, many issues, such as the meaning of FRAND and the compatibility with Article 102 of injunctions sought by SEP holders to enforce their patents, remain unresolved given the lack of clear precedents. This article provides a critical review of the main investigations carried out by the Commission over the past decade, including pending cases before the Commission and the European Court of Justice.
引用
收藏
页码:1125 / 1145
页数:21
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 2007, GUID IMPL ANSI PAT P
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MEMO13403 EUR COMM A
[3]  
[Anonymous], PATENTS STANDARDS IN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, MEMO07330 MEM COMM A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ABA ANT LAW SPRING M
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Indian Law Review
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The Economist
[8]  
Arthur C., 2012, The Guardian
[9]  
BEKKERS RUDI, 2009, ESSENTIAL PATENTS IN
[10]  
Brooks Roger, 2011, INTELLECTUAL PROPERT