Input skewedness, consistency, and order of frequent verbs in frequency-driven second language construction learning: A replication and extension of Casenhiser and Goldberg (2005) to adult second language acquisition

被引:8
作者
Nakamura, Daisuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Aoyama Gakuin Univ, Tokyo 150, Japan
来源
IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING | 2012年 / 50卷 / 01期
关键词
LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION; DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES; CATEGORIES; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1515/iral-2012-0001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Recent usage-based models of language acquisition research has found that three frequency manipulations; (1) skewed input (Casenhiser & Goldberg 2005), (2) input consistency (Childers & Tomasello 2001), and (3) order of frequent verbs (Goldberg, Casenhiser, & White 2007) facilitated construction learning in children. The present paper addresses the generalizability of these three frequency effects in adult second language construction learning. The study replicates and extends Casenhiser and Goldberg (2005) with an adult L2 learning population (N = 137) in a 2 (+/-skewed) x 2 (+/-consistent) x 2 (+/-forward skewing) factorial design. It was found that there were no significant positive effects of input skewedness on comprehension of an APPEARANCE construction (Casenhiser & Goldberg 2005) or a Samoan ergative construction (Robinson 2005), and had a negative effect on guided production of the APPEARANCE construction. On the other hand, input consistency had significant negative effects on comprehension of both constructions. In addition, it was only on comprehension of the APPEARANCE construction that providing verbs with relatively high token frequency during training had a positive effect. There were no significant interactions among the three frequency manipulations.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 37
页数:37
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, FREQUENCY USE ORG LA, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195301571.001.0001
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The acquisition of complex sentences, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511486531
[5]  
Barlow M., 2000, Usage based models of language
[6]   Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning [J].
Casenhiser, D ;
Goldberg, AE .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2005, 8 (06) :500-508
[7]   The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction [J].
Childers, JB ;
Tomasello, M .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 37 (06) :739-748
[8]  
Dabrowska E., 2004, LANGUAGE MIND BRAIN
[9]   Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change [J].
Diessel, Holger .
NEW IDEAS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 25 (02) :108-127
[10]   THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION ORDER AND LEARNING-MODE ON SCHEMA ABSTRACTION [J].
ELIO, R ;
ANDERSON, JR .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1984, 12 (01) :20-30