High temperature fracture toughness and residual stress in thermal barrier coatings evaluated by an in-situ indentation method

被引:50
作者
Qu, Zhaoliang [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Kai [3 ]
He, Qing [4 ]
He, Rujie [1 ]
Pei, Yongmao [5 ]
Wang, Shixing [4 ]
Fang, Daining [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Inst Adv Struct Technol, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, State Key Lab Adv Design & Mfg Vehicle Body, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Agr Mechanizat Sci, Surface Engn Res Inst, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Coll Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TBCs; In-situ indentation method; High temperature fracture toughness; High temperature residual stress; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CRACK-PROPAGATION; CERAMICS; AIR; EVOLUTION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.230
中图分类号
TQ174 [陶瓷工业]; TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
High temperature fracture toughness and residual stress are important for the evaluation of TBCs. In this paper, an in-situ high temperature indentation method was originally developed to investigate the high temperature fracture toughness and residual stress in a typical TBC, nanostructured 8 wt% yttria partially stabilized zirconia (YSZ) coating. The cracks caused by in-situ high temperature indentation tests were observed, and high temperature fracture toughness and residual stress were experimentally measured. The fracture toughness was measured to be 1.25, 0.91 and 0.75 MPa*m(1/2) at 25, 800 and 1000 degrees C, respectively. The residual stress was measured to be - 131.3, - 55.5 and - 45.5 MPa, correspondingly. Moreover, the residual stress and fracture toughness both decrease with increasing environmental temperature. It is also found that the fracture toughness without consideration of residual stress is significantly larger than the intrinsic fracture toughness, which may result from the compressive stress state.
引用
收藏
页码:7926 / 7929
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Thermal barrier coatings technology: critical review, progress update, remaining challenges and prospects [J].
Darolia, R. .
INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS REVIEWS, 2013, 58 (06) :315-348
[2]   Microstructural, mechanical and thermal characteristics of zirconia-based thermal barrier coatings deposited by plasma spraying [J].
Di Girolamo, G. ;
Blasi, C. ;
Brentari, A. ;
Schioppa, M. .
CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 41 (09) :11776-11785
[3]   Mechanics-based scaling laws for the durability of thermal barrier coatings [J].
Evans, AG ;
He, MY ;
Hutchinson, JW .
PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2001, 46 (3-4) :249-271
[4]   CRACK-PROPAGATION IN CERAMICS UNDER CYCLIC LOADS [J].
EWART, L ;
SURESH, S .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1987, 22 (04) :1173-1192
[5]   High temperature indentation tests of YSZ coatings in air up to 1200 °C [J].
He, Rujie ;
Qu, Zhaoliang ;
Pei, Yongmao ;
Fang, Daining .
MATERIALS LETTERS, 2017, 209 :5-7
[6]   Relationships between residual stress, microstructure and mechanical properties of electron beam physical vapor deposition thermal barrier coatings [J].
Johnson, CA ;
Ruud, JA ;
Bruce, R ;
Wortman, D .
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 108 (1-3) :80-85
[7]   A high-temperature displacement-sensitive indenter for studying mechanical properties of thermal barrier coatings [J].
Kim, CH ;
Heuer, AH .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2004, 19 (01) :351-356
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF THIN-LAYER SURFACE STRESSES BY INDENTATION FRACTURE [J].
LAWN, BR ;
FULLER, ER .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1984, 19 (12) :4061-4067
[9]   Evolution of mechanical properties of thermal barrier coatings subjected to thermal exposure by instrumented indentation testing [J].
Li, C. C. ;
Wang, T. ;
Liu, X. J. ;
Zheng, Z. H. ;
Li, Q. .
CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 42 (08) :10242-10250
[10]   Effect of substrate curvature on residual stresses and failure modes of an air plasma sprayed thermal barrier coating system [J].
Liu, D. ;
Seraffon, M. ;
Flewitt, P. E. J. ;
Simms, N. J. ;
Nicholls, J. R. ;
Rickerby, D. S. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2013, 33 (15-16) :3345-3357