Theoretical restrictions on longest implicit time scales in Markov state models of biomolecular dynamics

被引:2
作者
Sinitskiy, Anton V. [1 ]
Pande, Vijay S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Bioengn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; SIMULATIONS; KINETICS;
D O I
10.1063/1.5005058
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Markov state models (MSMs) have been widely used to analyze computer simulations of various biomolecular systems. They can capture conformational transitions much slower than an average or maximal length of a single molecular dynamics (MD) trajectory from the set of trajectories used to build the MSM. A rule of thumb claiming that the slowest implicit time scale captured by an MSM should be comparable by the order of magnitude to the aggregate duration of all MD trajectories used to build this MSM has been known in the field. However, this rule has never been formally proved. In this work, we present analytical results for the slowest time scale in several types of MSMs, supporting the above rule. We conclude that the slowest implicit time scale equals the product of the aggregate sampling and four factors that quantify: (1) how much statistics on the conformational transitions corresponding to the longest implicit time scale is available, (2) how good the sampling of the destination Markov state is, (3) the gain in statistics from using a sliding window for counting transitions between Markov states, and (4) a bias in the estimate of the implicit time scale arising from finite sampling of the conformational transitions. We demonstrate that in many practically important cases all these four factors are on the order of unity, and we analyze possible scenarios that could lead to their significant deviation from unity. Overall, we provide for the first time analytical results on the slowest time scales captured by MSMs. These results can guide further practical applications ofMSMs to biomolecular dynamics and allow for higher computational efficiency of simulations. Published by AIP Publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The Isomeric Preference of an Atypical Dopamine Transporter Inhibitor Contributes to Its Selection of the Transporter Conformation [J].
Abramyan, Ara M. ;
Stolzenberg, Sebastian ;
Li, Zheng ;
Loland, Claus J. ;
Noe, Frank ;
Shi, Lei .
ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 8 (08) :1735-1746
[2]   Advances, Interactions, and Future Developments in the CNS, Phenix, and Rosetta Structural Biology Software Systems [J].
Adams, Paul D. ;
Baker, David ;
Brunger, Axel T. ;
Das, Rhiju ;
DiMaio, Frank ;
Read, Randy J. ;
Richardson, David C. ;
Richardson, Jane S. ;
Terwilliger, Thomas C. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS, VOL 42, 2013, 42 :265-287
[3]   A molecular simulation protocol to avoid sampling redundancy and discover new states [J].
Bacci, Marco ;
Vitalis, Andreas ;
Caflisch, Amedeo .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS, 2015, 1850 (05) :889-902
[4]  
Bowman G. R., 2013, INTRO MARKOV STATE M
[5]   Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems [J].
Bowman, Gregory R. ;
Beauchamp, Kyle A. ;
Boxer, George ;
Pande, Vijay S. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 131 (12)
[6]   Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations [J].
Buch, Ignasi ;
Giorgino, Toni ;
De Fabritiis, Gianni .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (25) :10184-10189
[7]   Long-time protein folding dynamics from short-time molecular dynamics simulations [J].
Chodera, John D. ;
Swope, William C. ;
Pitera, Jed W. ;
Dill, Ken A. .
MULTISCALE MODELING & SIMULATION, 2006, 5 (04) :1214-1226
[8]   Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics [J].
Chodera, John D. ;
Noe, Frank .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 25 :135-144
[9]   Multibody cofactor and substrate molecular recognition in the myo-inositol monophosphatase enzyme [J].
Ferruz, Noelia ;
Tresadern, Gary ;
Pineda-Lucena, Antonio ;
De Fabritiis, Gianni .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
[10]  
Fiser A., 2017, From protein structure to function with bioinformatics, P91