Experimental and techno-economic analysis of two innovative solar thermal receiver designs for a point focus solar Fresnel collector

被引:13
作者
Danish, Syed Noman [1 ]
Al-Ansary, Hany [2 ,3 ]
El-Leathy, Abdelrahman [2 ,4 ]
Ba-Abbad, Mazen [5 ]
Khan, Salah Ud-Din [1 ,3 ]
Rizvi, Arslan [1 ,6 ]
Orfi, Jamel [2 ,3 ]
Al-Nakhli, Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Sustainable Energy Technol Ctr, POB 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Mech Engn Dept, POB 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ, KACARE Energy Res & Innovat Ctr, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Helwan Univ, Fac Engn, Mech Power Engn Dept, Cairo 11718, Egypt
[5] King Abdulaziz City Sci & Technol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, State Key Lab Multiphase Flow Power Engn, 28 Xianning West Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Concentrated solar power; Point focus Fresnel collector; Economic analysis; Experimentation; Jet impingement receiver; Helical channel receiver; CAVITY RECEIVER; OPTICAL-PERFORMANCE; POWER-GENERATION; ENERGY; PLANTS; PV;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.125035
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, techno-economic analysis and the experimental campaign for a new solar concentrating system are presented. Two novel receivers (Jet impingement receiver with mesh structure & helical channel receiver) are tested on a novel collector technology. The collector technology integrates the two established models of solar concentrating technologies, which are linear Fresnel reflector technology and central receiver technology, into the new concept called the Point Focus Fresnel Collector (PFFC). It is found that the PFFC system with jet impingement receiver and mesh structure provides higher thermal efficiency and manufacturing ease compared to parabolic dish systems. Maximum thermal efficiency of jet impingement receiver is highest at 87% whereas that for helical channel receiver is 83%. Average thermal efficiency of jet impingement receiver is 61% whereas that for helical channel receiver is 58%. Economic analysis of the system reveals that the discounted payback time for the PFFC system is only 5.5 years and less than one year compared to diesel and electricity powered steam generators respectively at an inflation rate of 2.5%. Substantial saving is predicted with PFFC system compared to diesel and electricity powered steam generator. For all discount rates in the range of 2.5-25%, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for PFFC system is much lower than that of LCOE in Saudi Arabia for conven-tional system. Since the LCOE in most of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries is higher than the LCOE in Saudi Arabia, therefore, the PFFC system is also suitable for other MENA countries where average direct normal irradiation values are comparable to Saudi Arabia.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Optical Performance of Double Receiver Compound Parabolic Concentrator [J].
Abdullahi, B. ;
Al-dadah, R. K. ;
Mouhmud, S. .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 :2625-2628
[2]  
Almotlaq YA, 2019, US Patent, Patent No. [10:190.802B1, 10190802]
[3]  
[Anonymous], SUKSESJAYA
[4]  
[Anonymous], CSP PROJ WORLD
[5]  
[Anonymous], SOLEC
[6]   Optical and thermal analysis of different cavity receiver designs for solar dish concentrators [J].
Bellos, Evangelos ;
Bousi, Erion ;
Tzivanidis, Christos ;
Pavlovic, Sasa .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2019, 2
[7]   Design and analysis of a dead volume control for a solar Stirling engine with induction generator [J].
Beltran-Chacon, Ricardo ;
Leal-Chavez, Daniel ;
Sauceda, D. ;
Pellegrini-Cervantes, Manuel ;
Borunda, Monica .
ENERGY, 2015, 93 :2593-2603
[8]  
Breyer C., 2010, 2010 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON 2010), P558, DOI 10.1109/ENERGYCON.2010.5771744
[9]  
Cai D, 2020, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, DOI [10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.106, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.106]
[10]   Thermal cycling test of solid particles to be used in concentrating solar power plants [J].
Calderon, Alejandro ;
Barreneche, Camila ;
Ines Fernandez, A. ;
Segarra, Merce .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2021, 222