Ontogeny of locomotion in mountain gorillas and chimpanzees

被引:187
作者
Doran, DM
机构
[1] Department of Anthropology, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
positional behavior; African apes; heterochrony;
D O I
10.1006/jhev.1996.0095
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The African apes are a group of closely related taxa that differ considerably in body size. In spite of the large body size difference, the African apes are similar in many aspects of their morphology; it has been suggested that most of their differences result from selection for these body size differences (Shea, 1988). The influence of body size on locomotion has been well-documented, but what is less clear, is whether these behavioral differences occur throughout ontogeny because few studies have directly addressed the influence of ontogeny (and changing body size) on locomotion. This study documents the ontogeny of mountain gorilla locomotion and compares it with that of chimpanzees in order to consider how changing body size during ontogeny influences locomotion in the two species. Results indicate that gorilla locomotor development is greatly accelerated compared with chimpanzees, and that much of the interspecific variation in age can be explained by body size. When chimpanzees and gorillas are at similar sizes (although widely disparate ages), they perform very similar locomotor activities. However, it is incorrect to view a gorilla as a faster growing and ultimately larger chimpanzee. Throughout ontogeny, gorillas have broader scapulae and relatively shorter phalanges and metacarpals than chimpanzees(Susman, 1979; Shea, 1981; Jungers & Susman, 1984; Inouye, 1992) which are associated differences in mountain gorilla and chimpanzee suspensory behavior; gorillas never show as high an incidence of suspensory behavior as chimpanzees during ontogeny. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 344
页数:22
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF BEHAVIOR - SAMPLING METHODS [J].
ALTMANN, J .
BEHAVIOUR, 1974, 49 (3-4) :227-267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Statistical Tables
[3]  
[Anonymous], PRIMATE BIO SOCIAL D
[4]  
BELL R, 1971, SCI AM, V225, P153
[5]   THE EFFECTS OF LEOPARD PREDATION ON GROUPING PATTERNS IN FOREST CHIMPANZEES [J].
BOESCH, C .
BEHAVIOUR, 1991, 117 :221-242
[6]  
Boesch Christophe, 1996, P101, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511752414.010
[7]  
BURNS C, 1979, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V50, P423
[8]   POSITIONAL BEHAVIOR AND BODY SIZE OF ARBOREAL PRIMATES - A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR FIELD STUDIES AND AN ILLUSTRATION OF ITS APPLICATION [J].
CANT, JGH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1992, 88 (03) :273-283
[10]   LORISIFORM WRIST JOINT AND EVOLUTION OF BRACHIATING ADAPTATIONS IN HOMINOIDEA [J].
CARTMILL, M ;
MILTON, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1977, 47 (02) :249-272