Individual but not fragile: Individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation

被引:32
作者
Kalanthroff, E. [1 ]
Henik, A.
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Psychol, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Stroop; Task conflict; Anterior cingulate cortex; Executive function; Stop signal; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; STOP-SIGNAL; OBJECT INTERFERENCE; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; COLOR; CONFLICT; BRAIN; MODEL; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Stroop effect is composed of interference and facilitation effects. The facilitation is less stable and thus many times is referred to as a "fragile effect". Here we suggest the facilitation effect is highly vulnerable to individual differences in control over the task conflict (between relevant color naming and irrelevant word reading in the Stroop task). We replicated previous findings of a significant correlation between stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) and Stroop interference, and also found a significant correlation between SSRT and the Stroop facilitation effect participants with low inhibitory control (i.e., long SSRT) had no facilitation effect or even a reversed one. These results shed new light on the "fragile" facilitation effect and highlight the necessity of awareness of task conflict, especially in the Stroop task. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 419
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: Brain activity and reaction time distributions [J].
Aarts, Esther ;
Roelofs, Ardi ;
van Turennout, Miranda .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (10) :2089-2099
[2]  
Allport A, 2000, CONTROL OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES: ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE XVIII, P35
[3]   A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex [J].
Aron, AR ;
Monsell, S ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
BRAIN, 2004, 127 :1561-1573
[4]   Executive Function: The Search for an Integrated Account [J].
Banich, Marie T. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 18 (02) :89-94
[5]   INVESTIGATIONS OF THE FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY OF ATTENTION USING THE STROOP TEST [J].
BENCH, CJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
GRASBY, PM ;
FRISTON, KJ ;
PAULESU, E ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ ;
DOLAN, RJ .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1993, 31 (09) :907-922
[6]   Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Fissell, K ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6758) :179-181
[7]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[8]   Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding Saccades [J].
Boucher, Leanne ;
Palmeri, Thomas J. ;
Logan, Gordon D. ;
Schall, Jeffrey D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (02) :376-397
[9]   The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework [J].
Braver, Todd S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (02) :106-113
[10]   Task conflict effect in task switching [J].
Braverman, Ami ;
Meiran, Nachshon .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2010, 74 (06) :568-578