Risk factors for non-invasive and invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ

被引:56
|
作者
Collins, Laura C. [1 ,2 ]
Achacoso, Ninah [3 ]
Haque, Reina [4 ]
Nekhlyudov, Larissa [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Fletcher, Suzanne W. [2 ,5 ]
Quesenberry, Charles P., Jr. [3 ]
Schnitt, Stuart J. [1 ,2 ]
Habel, Laurel A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente So Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente So Calif, Res & Evaluat, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
[5] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Vanguard Med Associates, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Ductal carcinoma in situ; Local recurrence; Risk factors invasive recurrence; BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION; YOUNG AGE; CANCER; WOMEN; RADIATION; EXCISION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-013-2539-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with local recurrence (LR) in a large population of DCIS patients treated with breast-conserving therapy between 1990-2001 in three health plans. Regression methods were used to estimate relative risks (RR) of LR. Among 2,995 patients, 325 had a LR [10.9 %; median follow-up 4.8 years (range 0.5-15.7)]. After adjusting for health plan and treatment, risk of LR was increased among women <45 years (RR = 2.1, 95 % CI 1.5-2.8), African-Americans (RR = 1.6; 95 % CI 1.1-2.1) and those with DCIS detected because of signs/symptoms (RR = 1.6; 95 % CI 1.2-2.0). After also adjusting for age and diagnosis year, pathologic features associated with increased LR were larger lesion size (RR = 2.9 for >= 20 low power fields of DCIS; 95 % CI 1.6-5.6) and involved (RR = 2.9; 95 % CI 1.6-5.2), or close margins (RR = 2.4; 95 % CI 1.6-3.8). Presentation with symptoms/signs was associated with increased risk of invasive recurrence; while African-American race, larger tumor size, and involved/close tumor margins were more strongly associated with increased risk of DCIS recurrence. Our findings suggest some risk factors differ for non-invasive and invasive LRs and that most factors are only moderately associated with increased LR risk. Future research efforts should focus on non-clinicopathologic factors to identify more powerful risk factors for LR.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 460
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ
    Takada, Koji
    Kashiwagi, Shinichiro
    Asano, Yuka
    Goto, Wataru
    Morisaki, Tamami
    Takahashi, Katsuyuki
    Fujita, Hisakazu
    Takashima, Tsutomu
    Tomita, Shuhei
    Hirakawa, Kosei
    Ohira, Masaichi
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [32] Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis among patients with pure invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with invasive micropapillary carcinoma, and invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with ductal carcinoma in situ A retrospective cohort study
    Guan, Xin
    Xu, Guiying
    Shi, Aiping
    Zou, Yabin
    Zhan, Yue
    Fan, Zhimin
    Dong, Yi
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (50) : E23487
  • [33] Multiple foci of microinvasion is associated with an increased risk of invasive local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery
    Eileen Rakovitch
    Rinku Sutradhar
    Nafisha Lalani
    Sharon Nofech-Mozes
    Sumei Gu
    Mira Goldberg
    Wedad Hanna
    Cindy Fong
    Lawrence Paszat
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 178 : 169 - 176
  • [34] Underestimation of invasive breast carcinoma in patients with initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: Size matters
    Bouzon Alejandro, Alberto
    Iglesias Lopez, Angela
    Acea Nebril, Benigno
    Garcia Jimenez, Maria Lourdes
    Diaz Carballada, Carlota Czestokowa
    Varela Romero, Jose Ramon
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2021, 99 (09): : 655 - 659
  • [35] How Did We Get There? The Progression from Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
    Dessources, Kimberly
    Martins Sebastiao, Ana Paula
    Pareja, Fresia
    Weigelt, Britta
    Reis-Filho, Jorge S.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2019, 11 (03) : 175 - 184
  • [36] Does a Close Surgical Margin for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Invasive Breast Carcinoma Affect Breast Cancer Recurrence?
    Kuru, Bekir
    Yuruker, Savas
    Sullu, Yurdanur
    Gursel, Bilge
    Ozen, Necati
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (07) : 627 - 633
  • [37] The locoregional recurrence post-mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ: Incidence and risk factors
    Bannani, Sahar
    Rouquette, Sophie
    Bendavid-Athias, Cecile
    Tas, Patrick
    Leveque, Jean
    BREAST, 2015, 24 (05) : 608 - 612
  • [38] Relationship Between Clinical and Pathologic Features of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Patient Age An Analysis of 657 Patients
    Collins, Laura C.
    Achacoso, Ninah
    Nekhlyudov, Larissa
    Fletcher, Suzanne W.
    Haque, Reina
    Quesenberry, Charles P., Jr.
    Puligandla, Balaram
    Alshak, Najeeb S.
    Goldstein, Lynn C.
    Gown, Allen M.
    Schnitt, Stuart J.
    Habel, Laurel A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 33 (12) : 1802 - 1808
  • [39] Tumor characteristics as predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Shi-Yi
    Shamliyan, Tatyana
    Virnig, Beth A.
    Kane, Robert
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 127 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [40] Local recurrence after ductal carcinoma in situ breast conserving treatment. Analysis of 195 cases
    Cutuli, B.
    Lemanski, C.
    Le Blanc-Onfroy, M.
    de Lafontan, B.
    Cohen-Solal-Le-Nir, C.
    Fondrinier, E.
    Mignotte, H.
    Giard, S.
    Charra-Brunaud, C.
    Auvray, H.
    Gonzague-Casabianca, L.
    Quetin, P.
    Fay, R.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2013, 17 (03): : 196 - 201