Cancer Risk of Anti-TNF-α at Recommended Doses in Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis with Intention to Treat and per Protocol Analyses

被引:64
作者
Moulis, Guillaume [1 ]
Sommet, Agnes
Bene, Johana
Montastruc, Francois
Sailler, Laurent [1 ]
Montastruc, Jean-Louis
Lapeyre-Mestre, Maryse
机构
[1] CHU Toulouse, Serv Med Interne, Toulouse, France
关键词
TUMOR-NECROSIS-FACTOR; MALIGNANCIES; THERAPY; CRITERIA; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0048991
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The risk of malignancies on TNF-alpha antagonists is controversial. The aim of this survey was to assess cancer risk on TNF-alpha antagonists in adult rheumatoid arthritis patients, including the five marketed drugs (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab and certolizumab) used in line with the New Drug Application. Furthermore, the relative interest of modified intention to treat or per protocol analyses to assess such sparse events remains unknown. Methodology/Principal Findings: Data sources were MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ISI Web of Science, ACR and EULAR meeting abstracts, scientific evaluation of the drugs leading to their marketing approval, and clinicaltrials. gov, until 31 December 2012. We selected double-blind randomized controlled trials in adult rheumatoid arthritis patients, including at least one treatment arm in line with New Drug Application. We performed random effect meta-analysis, with modified intention to treat and per protocol analyses. Thirty-three trials were included. There was no excess risk of malignancies on anti-TNF-alpha administered in line with New Drug Application in the per protocol model (OR, 0.93 95% CI[0.59-1.44]), as well as in the modified intention to treat model (OR, 1.27 95% CI[0.82-1.98]). There was a non-significant tendency for an excess non-melanoma skin cancer risk in both models (respectively, 1.37 [0.71-2.66] and 1.90 [0.98-3.67]). With fixed effect Peto model restricting to trials during at least 52 weeks, the overall cancer risk was respectively 1.60 [0.97-2.64] and 1.22 [0.72-2.08]. Whatever the model, modified intention to treat analysis led to higher estimations than per protocol analysis. The later may underestimate the treatment effect when assessing very sparse events and when many patients dropped out in placebo arms. In metaregression, there was no differential risk among the five drugs. Conclusions/Significance: This study did not find any evidence for an excess cancer risk on TNF-alpha antagonists in adult rheumatoid arthritis patients, but an excess cancer risk after several years of exposure cannot be ruled out. Both modified intention to treat and per protocol analyses should be presented in such safety analyses.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Tumor necrosis factor alpha drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and metaanalysis of efficacy and safety [J].
Alonso-Ruiz, Alberto ;
Pijoan, Jose Ignacio ;
Ansuategui, Eukene ;
Urkaregi, Arantxa ;
Calabozo, Marcelo ;
Quintana, Antonio .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
[2]   THE AMERICAN-RHEUMATISM-ASSOCIATION 1987 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
ARNETT, FC ;
EDWORTHY, SM ;
BLOCH, DA ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
FRIES, JF ;
COOPER, NS ;
HEALEY, LA ;
KAPLAN, SR ;
LIANG, MH ;
LUTHRA, HS ;
MEDSGER, TA ;
MITCHELL, DM ;
NEUSTADT, DH ;
PINALS, RS ;
SCHALLER, JG ;
SHARP, JT ;
WILDER, RL ;
HUNDER, GG .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (03) :315-324
[3]   Cancer risk with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitors: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab using patient level data [J].
Askling, Johan ;
Fahrbach, Kyle ;
Nordstrom, Beth ;
Ross, Susan ;
Schmid, Christopher H. ;
Symmons, Deborah .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 20 (02) :119-130
[4]   Tumour necrosis factor and cancer [J].
Balkwill, Frances .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2009, 9 (05) :361-371
[5]   Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies - Systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials [J].
Bongartz, T ;
Sutton, AJ ;
Sweeting, MJ ;
Buchan, I ;
Matteson, EL ;
Montori, V .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (19) :2275-2285
[6]   Etanercept therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of malignancies: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J].
Bongartz, T. ;
Warren, F. C. ;
Mines, D. ;
Matteson, E. L. ;
Abrams, K. R. ;
Sutton, A. J. .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2009, 68 (07) :1177-1183
[7]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[8]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[9]   Pitfalls in meta-analyses on adverse events reported from clinical trials [J].
Huang, Han-Yao ;
Andrews, Elizabeth ;
Jones, Judith ;
Skovron, Mary Lou ;
Tilson, Hugh .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 20 (10) :1014-1020
[10]   Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? [J].
Jadad, AR ;
Moore, RA ;
Carroll, D ;
Jenkinson, C ;
Reynolds, DJM ;
Gavaghan, DJ ;
McQuay, HJ .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01) :1-12