The Collaborative Management of Sustained Unsustainability: On the Performance of Participatory Forms of Environmental Governance

被引:48
作者
Bluehdorn, Ingolfur [1 ]
Deflorian, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Econ & Business WU, Inst Social Change & Sustainabil IGN, Welthandelspl 2, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
environmental governance; performance; politics of unsustainability; eco-political disability; simulative politics; SYMBOLIC POLITICS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSUMPTION; SUSTAINABILITY; SOCIOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; DEMOCRACY; POPULISM; ECOLOGY; SEARCH;
D O I
10.3390/su11041189
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In modern democratic consumer societies, decentralized, participative, and consensus oriented forms of multi-stakeholder governance are supplementing, and often replacing, conventional forms of state-centered environmental government. The engagement in all phases of the policy process of diverse social actors has become a hallmark of environmental good governance. This does not mean to say, however, that these modes of policy-making have proved particularly successful in resolving the widely debated multiple sustainability crisis. In fact, they have been found wanting in terms of their ability to respond to democratic needs and their capacity to resolve environmental problems. So why have these participatory forms of environmental governance become so prominent? What exactly is their appeal? What do they deliver? Exploring these questions from the perspective of eco-political and sociological theory, this article suggests that these forms of environmental governance represent a performative kind of eco-politics that helps liberal consumer societies to manage their inability and unwillingness to achieve the socio-ecological transformation that scientists and environmental activists say is urgently required. This reading of the prevailing policy approaches as the collaborative management of sustained unsustainability adds an important dimension to the understanding of environmental governance and contemporary eco-politics more generally.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 107 条
[71]  
Luhmann Niklas., 1986, Okologische Kommunikation. Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf okologische Gefahrdungen einstellen?
[72]  
Macnaghten P., 1998, CONTESTED NATURES
[73]   The 21st Conference of the Parties Climate Summit in Paris: A Slippery Slope [J].
Mahapatra, Sushanta Kumar ;
Ratha, Keshab Chandra .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 28 (06) :991-996
[74]  
Mair P., 2013, Ruling the Void
[75]   Individualised or participatory? Exploring late-modern identity and sustainable development [J].
Middlemiss, Lucie .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2014, 23 (06) :929-946
[76]  
Mitchell Timothy., 2011, Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil
[77]  
Monticelli L, 2018, TRIPLEC-COMMUN CAPIT, V16, P501
[78]   Good Intents, but Low Impacts: Diverging Importance of Motivational and Socioeconomic Determinants Explaining Pro-Environmental Behavior, Energy Use, and Carbon Footprint [J].
Moser, Stephanie ;
Kleinhueckelkotten, Silke .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 50 (06) :626-656
[79]   What if consumers decided to all 'go green'? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions [J].
Murray, Cameron K. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 54 :240-256
[80]  
Newig J., 2009, Environ. Policy Gov, V19, P197, DOI DOI 10.1002/EET.509