Acoustic Features of Voice in Patients with Severe Hearing Loss

被引:19
作者
Mora, Renzo [1 ]
Crippa, Barbara [1 ]
Cervoni, Edoardo [1 ]
Santomauro, Valentina [1 ]
Guastini, Luca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, ENT Dept, Genoa, Italy
关键词
Multidimensional Voice Program; sensorineural hearing loss; voice; FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; AUDITORY-FEEDBACK; SPEECH; CHILDREN; AGE; NASALANCE; DEAFNESS; ADULTS; NOISE;
D O I
10.2310/7070.2011.110150
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the acoustic features of voice in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Design: Thirty male patients, between 35 and 53 years of age with postlingual bilateral symmetric severe sensorineural hearing loss, were included (group A). As a control group (group B), 30 normal-hearing male adults, aged 38 to 51 years, were identified. Setting: ENT Department, University of Genoa (Italy). Methods: Phonetically balanced sentences and sustained vowels a, e, and i were digitally recorded with the Multidimensional Voice Program (Kay Elemetrics) in all subjects. Main Outcome Measures: The parameters estimated were the average of fundamental frequency (F0), jitter percent (jitter), shimmer, noise to harmonics ratio (NHR), voice turbulence index (VTI), soft phonation index (SPI), degree of voicelessness (DUV), degree of voice breaks (DVB), and peak amplitude variation (vAm). Results: Compared to the control group, in group A, the following acoustic parameters presented a statistically significantly higher value (p < .05) of F0 (137.2 Hz vs 120.0 Hz), jitter (1.93% vs 0.67%), shimmer (6.67% vs 3.81%), NHR (0.19 vs 0.10), SPI (12.9 vs 8.76), DVB (2.12% vs 0.01%), DUV (9.53% vs 0.51%), and vAm (23.12 % vs 12.06%). In group A, F0 was also significantly higher in the balanced sentences (126 Hz vs 111 Hz). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that hearing loss affects voice production by changing its parameters, especially in subjects with marked hearing loss.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOS
[2]  
Awan SN, 2001, CLIN LINGUIST PHONET, V15, P117, DOI 10.3109/02699200109167642
[3]   The aged voice:: A new hypothesis (Reprinted from Voice, vol 3, pg 57-73, 1994) [J].
Baken, RJ .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2005, 19 (03) :317-325
[4]  
Baraldi Giovana dos Santos, 2007, Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, V73, P378
[5]   Effects of hearing loss on the voice in children [J].
Bolfan-Stosic, Natalija ;
Simunjak, Boris .
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 36 (02) :120-123
[6]   THE MIDDLE-EAR MUSCLES [J].
BORG, E ;
COUNTER, SA .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1989, 261 (02) :74-80
[7]   STAPEDIUS REFLEX AND SPEECH FEATURES [J].
BORG, E ;
ZAKRISSON, JE .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1973, 54 (02) :525-527
[8]   On the problem of listening while talking [J].
Borg, Erik ;
Gustafsson, Dan ;
Bergkvist, Christina ;
Wikstrom, Carina .
LOGOPEDICS PHONIATRICS VOCOLOGY, 2009, 34 (04) :218-223
[9]   Voice F-0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: A preliminary study [J].
Burnett, TA ;
Senner, JE ;
Larson, CR .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1997, 11 (02) :202-211
[10]   UNDERSTANDING SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY IN THE HEARING-IMPAIRED [J].
CARNEY, AE .
TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS, 1986, 6 (03) :47-59