Electric mobility in Europe: A comprehensive review of motivators and barriers in decision making processes

被引:292
作者
Biresselioglu, Mehmet Efe [1 ]
Kaplan, Melike Demirbag [2 ]
Yilmaz, Barbara Katharina [1 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Univ Econ, Sustainable Energy Div, Sakarya Cad 156, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Izmir Univ Econ, Business Sch, Dept Business Adm, Izmir, Turkey
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Electric mobility; Electric vehicles; Europe; Decision making process; Motivators; Barriers; PLUG-IN HYBRID; TOTAL-COST; CLIMATE-CHANGE; VEHICLE; ENERGY; TRANSPORT; CAR; OWNERSHIP; BEHAVIOR; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
European Union's (EU) long-term objective of achieving a competitive low carbon economy is mainly based on enabling environmentally sustainable investments, particularly in terms of decreasing energy consumption in buildings, transition to electric vehicles, and developing smart electricity networks, while promoting renewable energy use in order to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 80% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. Since, transport is one of the main sector responsible for EU's emissions; diffusion of Electric Vehicles (EVs) could allow immense reduction. Therefore, since the announcement of 2050 Roadmap in 2009, there has been a great increase in studies exploring the viability of transition to e-mobility in a Europe-wide context, identifying common factors and variables. However, it is usually not that straightforward when decision makers seek to transform these variables into policy implications that will actually help to achieve the EU goals on energy transition. At this point, the motivators and barriers are of utmost importance. Accordingly, this study is based on an extensive and up-to-date review of the existing literature on e-mobility in Europe, with the main aim of identifying and mapping the motivators and barriers for the diffusion of electric mobility through three levels of decision-making: Formal Social Units, Collective Decision-Making Units, and Individual Units. Results of the analysis identifies that the main barriers are lack of charging infrastructure; economic restrictions and cost concerns; technical and operational restrictions; lack of trust; information and knowledge; limited supply of electricity and raw materials; and practicability concerns. Thus, key motivators appear to be environmental, economic and technical benefits associated with EVs, as well as personal and demographic factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 90 条
[11]   Introducing electric mobility in Latvian municipalities: results of a survey [J].
Barisa, Aiga ;
Rosa, Marika ;
Kisele, Agate .
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, CONECT 2015, 2016, 95 :50-57
[12]  
Barlag H., 2015, FINAL PUBLISHABLE SU
[13]   Still underdetected - Social norms and collective efficacy predict the acceptance of electric vehicles in Germany [J].
Barth, Markus ;
Jugert, Philipp ;
Fritsche, Immo .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2016, 37 :64-77
[14]   Perspectives of electric mobility: Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany [J].
Bubeck, Steffen ;
Tomaschek, Jan ;
Fahl, Ulrich .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 50 :63-77
[15]   Electric vehicle drivers' reported interactions with the public: Driving stereotype change? [J].
Burgess, Mark ;
King, Naomi ;
Harris, Margaret ;
Lewis, Elisa .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 17 :33-44
[16]  
Caramizaru A., 2015, ENSURE SUSTAINABILIT
[17]   The state of the art of electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles [J].
Chan, C. C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2007, 95 (04) :704-718
[18]  
Cherchi E., 2015, DELIVERABLE 9 1 CONS
[19]   Cogeneration and district heating networks: Measures to remove institutional and financial barriers that restrict their joint use in the EU-28 [J].
Colmenar-Santos, Antonio ;
Rosales-Asensio, Enrique ;
Borge-Diez, David ;
Mur-Perez, Francisco .
ENERGY, 2015, 85 :403-414
[20]   Local promotion of electric mobility in cities: Guidelines and real application case in Italy [J].
Comodi, G. ;
Caresana, F. ;
Salvi, D. ;
Pelagalli, L. ;
Lorenzetti, M. .
ENERGY, 2016, 95 :494-503