Corporate Ecological Responsiveness: Antecedent Effects of Institutional Pressure and Top Management Commitment and Their Impact on Organizational Performance

被引:254
作者
Colwell, Scott R. [1 ,2 ]
Joshi, Ashwin W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Coll Management & Econ, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Psychol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
关键词
institutional theory; natural environment; management commitment; environmental responsibility; ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY; GREEN; LEGITIMACY; STAKEHOLDER; CONSTRUCTION; ISOMORPHISM; PERCEPTIONS; RESPONSES; VARIANCE; LINKAGES;
D O I
10.1002/bse.732
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Institutional theory argues that conformity to institutional pressure enhances the survival probability of organizations. Two key limitations of institutional theory have been proposed in recent literature: one, that it ignores the role of top management, and two, that it focuses only on survival as a benefit to the exclusion of more strategic benefits such as growth and profitability. In this research, we build a conceptual model that addresses both of these limitations in the context of institutional pressure on organizations to behave more responsibly vis a vis the natural environment. Results from a survey of 199 manufacturing firms show that the relationship between institutional pressure and corporate responsiveness to the pressure (i.e. corporate environmental responsiveness) is enhanced when top management commitment to the environment is high. Moreover, results show that organizational conformity to institutional pressure enhances the strategic benefits that organizations receive. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 91
页数:19
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02291366
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Institutional patterns and culture
[4]   Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment [J].
Aragón-Correa, JA ;
Matías-Reche, F ;
Senise-Barrio, ME .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2004, 57 (09) :964-975
[5]   THE DOUBLE-EDGE OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION [J].
Ashforth, Blake E. ;
Gibbs, Barrie W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1990, 1 (02) :177-194
[6]  
Atuahene-Gima K, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P583, DOI [10.2307/20159603, 10.5465/20159603]
[7]   Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type [J].
Banerjee, SB ;
Iyer, ES ;
Kashyap, RK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2003, 67 (02) :106-122
[8]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[9]   Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment [J].
Bansal, P ;
Clelland, I .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (01) :93-103
[10]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736