The Mir Yeshiva's Holocaust Experience: Ultra-Orthodox Perspectives on Japanese Wartime Attitudes towards Jewish Refugees

被引:3
作者
Kowner, Rotem [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Japanese Studies, Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Dept Asian Studies, Haifa, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
ISRAEL; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1093/hgs/dcac036
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
The exodus of Jewish refugees from Lithuania to East Asia in late 1940 has become one of the most remarkable stories of rescue during the Holocaust. The largest group among these refugees was the Mir Yeshiva-one of Europe's most notable Jewish educational institutions at the time, and the only Lithuanian yeshiva to survive the war in its entirety. Recent studies of this story have emphasized the role of the rescuers-particularly the Japanese vice consul Sugihara Chiune, who issued visas to the Jews-while neglecting the perspectives of the rescued. Nevertheless, the Mir Yeshiva has produced numerous accounts of its wartime ordeal over the past seventy years. Overlooked for the most part by the historiography of this period, the Mir testimonies and writings shed new light on the experiences of the Jewish refugees in Lithuania (1939-1940) and East Asia (1941-1945). Considering these accounts within their broader historical and international context, this article highlights their contribution to our understanding of this episode and Japanese wartime attitudes toward Jewish refugees.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 314
页数:20
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Altman Ilya, 2016, ASIA JAPAN J, V11, P61
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PERSONA NONGRATA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1941, COMMUNICATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, AFP EXPATICA 0730
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1940, HATZOFE 0425, P3
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1941, HAMASHKIF 0701, P2
[7]  
[Anonymous], CHIUNE SEMPO SUGIHAR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, BET MIDRASH, V346, P4
[9]  
Bauer Yehuda, 1981, AM JEWRY HOLOCAUST A, P109
[10]   In perfect faith: Jewish religious commemoration of the Holocaust (An interpretation of collective contextual memory following the Shoah) [J].
Baumel, JT .
STUDIES IN RELIGION-SCIENCES RELIGIEUSES, 2001, 30 (01) :5-21