Analysis of uncertainties in the IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose audit system

被引:25
作者
Izewska, J. [1 ]
Hultqvist, M. [2 ]
Bera, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] IAEA, Dept Nucl Sci & Applicat, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
[2] Stockholm Univ, Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Radiat Phys, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
uncertainties in TLD system; TLD postal audit; radiotherapy dose comparison;
D O I
10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.01.011
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) operate the IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose audit programme. Thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) are used as transfer devices in this programme. In the present work the uncertainties in the dose determination from TLD measurements have been evaluated. The analysis of uncertainties comprises uncertainties in the calibration coefficient of the TLD system and uncertainties in factors correcting for dose response non-linearity, fading of TL signal, energy response and influence of TLD holder. The individual uncertainties have been combined to estimate the total uncertainty in the dose evaluated from TLD measurements. The combined relative standard uncertainty in the dose determined from TLD measurements has been estimated to be 1.2% for irradiations with Co-60 gamma-rays and 1.6% For irradiations with high-energy X-rays. Results from irradiations by the Bureau international des poids et mesures (BIPM), Primary Standard Dosimetry Laboratories (PSDLs) and Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratories (SSDLs) compare favourably with the estimated uncertainties, whereas TLD results of radiotherapy centres show higher standard deviations than those derived theoretically. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:959 / 963
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Aguirre J. F., 2002, P INT S STAND COD PR, P191
[2]   The ESTRO-QUALity assurance network (EQUAL) [J].
Ferreira, IH ;
Dutreix, A ;
Bridier, A ;
Chavaudra, J ;
Svensson, H .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 55 (03) :273-284
[3]  
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), 2000, TECHNICAL REPORT SER, V398
[4]  
*ISO IEC OIML BIPM, GUID EXPR UNC MEAS
[5]   The influence of the IAEA standard holder on dose evaluated from TLD samples [J].
Izewska, J ;
Novotny, J ;
VanDam, J ;
Dutreix, A ;
vanderSchueren, E .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (03) :465-473
[6]   The IAEA/WHO TLD postal programme for radiotherapy hospitals [J].
Izewska, J ;
Andreo, P .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 54 (01) :65-72
[7]   IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose audit service and high precision measurements for radiotherapy level dosimetry [J].
Izewska, J ;
Bera, P ;
Vatnitsky, S .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2002, 101 (1-4) :387-392
[8]  
Izewska J., 2002, P INT S STAND COD PR, P139
[9]   UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF ABSORBED DOSE CALCULATIONS FROM THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETERS [J].
KIRBY, TH ;
HANSON, WF ;
JOHNSTON, DA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (06) :1427-1433
[10]  
ROUE A, 2004, CANC RADIOTHER S1, V8, P44