Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for H5 low pathogenic avian influenza virus antibody detection in duck sera using Bayesian methods

被引:6
作者
Schmitz, Audrey [1 ]
Le Bras, Marie-Odile [1 ]
Guillemoto, Carole [1 ]
Pierre, Isabelle [1 ]
Rose, Nicolas [2 ]
Bougeard, Stephanie [2 ]
Jestin, Veronique [1 ]
机构
[1] French Agcy Food Environm & Occupat Hlth & Safety, Ploufragan Plouzane Lab, French Natl Reference Lab Avian Influenza & Newca, Immunol & Parasitol Unit,VIPAC, F-22440 Ploufragan, France
[2] French Agcy Food Environm & Occupat Hlth & Safety, Anses, Ploufragan Plouzane Lab, Epidemiol & Welf Pig Prod Res Unit EBEP, F-22440 Ploufragan, France
关键词
Influenza; H5; antibodies; ELISA; HI test; Duck; Bayesian methods; LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY; COMPETITIVE ELISA; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES; A VIRUSES; NUCLEOPROTEIN; SURVEILLANCE; VALIDATION; INFECTION; POULTRY; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.05.002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Following the emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (AI), active surveillance of infections due to the H5 and H7 subtypes in poultry has increased and been made compulsory in Europe since 2002, by means of annual serological surveys using the haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. Domestic anseriforms, particularly ducks and geese, are more frequently infected by H5 low pathogenic AI virus, often subclinically, and represent a threat for other terrestrial poultry. 1783 sera, mainly from ducks, have been used to evaluate and compare a commercial ELISA kit detecting H5 antibodies with the currently recommended HI test. Different approaches to calculating specificity and sensitivity have been used, including the original Bayesian method. Results were similar when data were analyzed at the individual and batch levels, and when using different methods of calculation. However, results showed that H5 ELISA had both a higher sensitivity and a lower specificity than the HI test. Given that sensitivity is the most important factor for a screening test, H5 ELISA could therefore be recommended for AI surveillance, followed in cases of positivity by molecular tests aimed at detecting the virus gene. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 204
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
AFNOR, 1994, 57251 AFNOR NF ISO
[2]   Avian influenza - Diagnosis [J].
Alexander, D. J. .
ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 55 (01) :16-23
[3]   History of highly pathogenic avian influenza [J].
Alexander, D. J. ;
Brown, I. H. .
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2009, 28 (01) :19-38
[4]   A review of avian influenza in different bird species [J].
Alexander, DJ .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 74 (1-2) :3-13
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Official Journal of the European Union L010, P16
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Terrestrial Animal Health Code
[7]   AREA ABOVE ORDINAL DOMINANCE GRAPH AND AREA BELOW RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC GRAPH [J].
BAMBER, D .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 12 (04) :387-415
[8]  
Batey N., 2011, ANN REPORT SURVEILLA
[9]   Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling [J].
Branscum, AJ ;
Gardner, IA ;
Johnson, WO .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2005, 68 (2-4) :145-163
[10]   Phylogeny and genotyping of recent avian low-pathogenic H5 subtype influenza viruses from French ducks [J].
Briand, F. -X. ;
Le Gall-Recule, G. ;
Guillou-Cloarec, C. ;
Ogor, K. ;
Jestin, V. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 2010, 91 :960-970