Comparison of the effects of three cryoprotectants on the cryopreservation of mouse subcutaneous tissue under different conditions

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Shengcun [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Xia [1 ]
Zhou, Jing [1 ]
Jin, Jing [1 ]
Zuo, Qisheng [1 ]
Li, Bichun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, 48 Wenhui East Rd, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nantong Univ, Lab Anim Ctr, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cryopreservation; cryoprotectant; subcutaneous tissue; PRESERVATION; RAT;
D O I
10.3892/etm.2020.9076
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The subcutaneous tissue of animals contains different cell types, and different cells have different requirements for cryopreservation. This establishes obstacles that need to be overcome in the clinical application of tissue preservation. In the present study, the effects of different freezing rates and various concentrations of cryoprotectants on the cryopreservation of subcutaneous tissue of mice were compared, and these results provided basic research data that can be used to explore the optimal cryopreservation method for tissue. The effects of three cryoprotectants, dimethyl sulfoxide, glycerinum and 1,2-propanediol, and their concentrations on the cryopreservation of subcutaneous tissue of mice were compared with slow and rapid freezing rates. The results revealed that under various cryopreservation conditions, the percentage of fibroblasts that grow from the tissue following slow cryopreservation (19.8%) was significantly higher than that following rapid freezing (6.7%) at osmotic equilibrium for 10-20 min (P<0.05). After 19 days of culture, under the conditions of slow freezing, with 10, 20 and 30% glycerinum as a cryoprotectant, respectively, fibroblasts grew from 26.0, 16.7 and 16.7% of the tissues, respectively. No fibroblasts were indicated in the tissue mass cultured in any other tissue blocks treated with cryopreservation solutions. Under the condition of rapid freezing, fibroblasts grew from 6.7 and 6.7% tissue blocks of 20% DMSO and 10% glycerinum, respectively, following 19 days of culture. No fibroblasts were identified in the tissue mass cultured in the other tissue blocks treated with cryopreservation solutions, and no fibroblasts were identified in the tissue blocks without osmotic balance before freezing.
引用
收藏
页码:3285 / 3289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of different cryoprotectants on the cryopreservation of cattle testicular tissue
    Hu, S.
    Zhu, Q. -C.
    Han, C.
    Zhang, X. -G.
    Song, B. Y.
    Xie, D. -Q.
    Wei, S. -Y.
    Hu, J. -H.
    ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 2015, 58 : 433 - 439
  • [2] The Comparison of Three Different Cryoprotectants in Cryopreservation of Angora Goat Semen
    Buyukleblebici, Serhat
    Tuncer, Purhan Barbaros
    Tasdemir, Umut
    Ozgurtas, Taner
    Durmaz, Emre
    Buyukleblebici, Olga
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2014, 20 (04) : 613 - 619
  • [3] Comparison of permeating and nonpermeating cryoprotectants for mouse sperm cryopreservation
    Sztein, JM
    Noble, K
    Farley, JS
    Mobraaten, LE
    CRYOBIOLOGY, 2001, 42 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [4] Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa: comparison of two cryopreservation methods and three cryoprotectants
    Nallella, KP
    Sharma, RK
    Allamaneni, SSR
    Aziz, N
    Agarwal, A
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 (04) : 913 - 918
  • [5] Effects of Three Different Types of Antifreeze Proteins on Mouse Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Transplantation
    Lee, Jaewang
    Kim, Seul Ki
    Youm, Hye Won
    Kim, Hak Jun
    Lee, Jung Ryeol
    Suh, Chang Suk
    Kim, Seok Hyun
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [6] Effects of different cryopreservation methods and cryoprotectants on human spermatozoa
    Darvishnia, H.
    Sadeghi, M. R.
    Lahijani, M. Shams
    Akhondi, M. M.
    Hojjat, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 : I153 - I153
  • [7] Comparison of Different Support Materials and Cryoprotectants for Amniotic Membrane Cryopreservation
    Ogliari, Karolyn
    Grudzinski, Patricia
    Immig, Monica
    Halon, Maria
    Loth, Fabrizio
    Tovo, Monique
    da Silva, Camila
    Beckenkamp, Liziane
    STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (SUPPL 1) : S20 - S21
  • [8] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SUPPORT MATERIALS AND CRYOPROTECTANTS FOR AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE CRYOPRESERVATION
    Ogliari, K. S.
    Grudzinski, P. B.
    Immig, M. L.
    Halon, M. L.
    Loth, F. B.
    Tovo, M. B.
    Silva, C. G.
    Beckenkamp, L. R.
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2022, 24 (05) : S186 - S186
  • [9] EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT CRYOPROTECTANTS AND CRYOPRESERVATION PROTOCOLS ON THE DEVELOPMENT of 2-4 CELL MOUSE EMBRYOS
    Liu, Wei-Xin
    Lu, Hua
    Luo, Meng-Jun
    Xu, Liang-Zhi
    CRYOLETTERS, 2011, 32 (03) : 240 - 247