Best practices on team communication: interprofessional practice in oncology

被引:5
作者
D'Alimonte, Laura [1 ,4 ]
McLaney, Elizabeth [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Di Prospero, Lisa [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Odette Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Interprofess Educ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Practice Based Res & Innovat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Cte Interprofess Educ, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
best practices; communication; interprofessional collaboration; teamwork; MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM; PATIENT; MANAGEMENT; STUDENTS; MEETINGS; CARE; COLLABORATION; CHALLENGES; DECISION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/SPC.0000000000000412
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of review Good communication is the cornerstone of interprofessional care teams providing optimized quality patient care. Over the last decade, advances in technology have provided tools to improve communication; however, opportunities still exist for innovation and implementation. Recent findings The literature suggests that interprofessional education and assessment of team communication are fundamental in supporting collaborative care. The literature favours an interactive, team-based approach (e.g. simulation) to learning about communication, in which communication competencies and behaviours are practiced explicitly in an open, feedback-rich environment. Summary Key elements of excellence in communication are embedded in three priority recommendations: first, the team must adopt a practice strategy that leverages accessible and timely communication second, the team must be open to initial and ongoing training within the domain of 'effective communication' third, communication must be the cornerstone to producing a high-performing team that will provide the best care possible.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Framework for Action on Inter-professional Education and Collaborative Practice
  • [2] Evaluation of interprofessional relational coordination and patients' perception of care in outpatient oncology teams
    Azar, Jose M.
    Johnson, Cynthia S.
    Frame, Amie M.
    Perkins, Susan M.
    Cottingham, Ann H.
    Litzelman, Debra K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2017, 31 (02) : 273 - 276
  • [3] Team Communication: It's About Patient Safety
    Childress, Susan B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2015, 11 (01) : 23 - +
  • [4] CIHC, 2010, NAT INT COMP FRAM
  • [5] Systematic review of multidisciplinary teams in the management of lung cancer
    Coory, M.
    Gkolia, P.
    Yang, I. A.
    Bowman, R. V.
    Fong, K. M.
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2008, 60 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [6] The outcome of interprofessional education: Integrating communication studies into a standardized patient experience for advanced practice nursing students
    Defenbaugh, Nicole
    Chikotas, Noreen E.
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (01) : 176 - 181
  • [7] Five challenges to ethical communication for interprofessional paediatric practice: A social work perspective
    Delany, Clare
    Richards, Angela
    Stewart, Helen
    Kosta, Lauren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2017, 31 (04) : 505 - 511
  • [8] Team Dynamics, Decision Making, and Attitudes Toward Multidisciplinary Cancer Meetings: Health Professionals' Perspectives
    Devitt, Bianca
    Philip, Jennifer
    McLachlan, Sue-Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2010, 6 (06) : E17 - E20
  • [9] An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer
    Forrest, LM
    McMillan, DC
    McArdle, CS
    Dunlop, DJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (09) : 977 - 978
  • [10] Impact of multidisciplinary team management in head and neck cancer patients
    Friedland, P. L.
    Bozic, B.
    Dewar, J.
    Kuan, R.
    Meyer, C.
    Phillips, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 104 (08) : 1246 - 1248