Reliability-Based Design Optimization Strategies Based on FORM: A Review

被引:104
作者
Lopez, Rafael Holdorf [1 ]
Beck, Andre Teofilo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Civil Engn, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Struct Engn, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
RBDO; structural reliability; structural optimization; APPROXIMATE PROGRAMMING STRATEGY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1590/S1678-58782012000400012
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In deterministic optimization, the uncertainties of the structural system (i.e. dimension, model, material, loads, etc) are not explicitly taken into account. Hence, resulting optimal solutions may lead to reduced reliability levels. The objective of reliability based design optimization (RBDO) is to optimize structures guaranteeing that a minimum level of reliability, chosen a priori by the designer, is maintained. Since reliability analysis using the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) is an optimization procedure itself, RBDO (in its classical version) is a double-loop strategy: the reliability analysis (inner loop) and the structural optimization (outer loop). The coupling of these two loops leads to very high computational costs. To reduce the computational burden of RBDO based on FORM, several authors propose decoupling the structural optimization and the reliability analysis. These procedures may be divided in two groups: (i) serial single loop methods and (ii) uni-level methods. The basic idea of serial single loop methods is to decouple the two loops and solve them sequentially, until some convergence criterion is achieved. On the other hand, uni-level methods employ different strategies to obtain a single loop of optimization to solve the RBDO problem. This paper presents a review of such RBDO strategies. A comparison of the performance (computational cost) of the main strategies is presented for several variants of two benchmark problems from the literature and for a structure modeled using the finite element method.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 514
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   An inverse-measure-based unilevel architecture for reliability-based design optimization [J].
Agarwal, Harish ;
Mozumder, Chandan K. ;
Renaud, John E. ;
Watson, Layne T. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2007, 33 (03) :217-227
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 42 AIAA SDM C SEAT
[4]   Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization [J].
Aoues, Younes ;
Chateauneuf, Alaa .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 41 (02) :277-294
[5]  
Bazan F.A.V., 2012, INT J UNCERTAIN QUAN, V2, P1, DOI [10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2011003415, DOI 10.1615/INT.J.UNCERTAINTYQUANTIFICATION.2011003415]
[6]   A comparison of deterministic, reliability-based and risk-based structural optimization under uncertainty [J].
Beck, Andre Teofilo ;
de Santana Gomes, Wellison Jose .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2012, 28 :18-29
[7]  
Chen W., 2003, DETC2003DAC48706 ASM
[8]   A sequential approximate programming strategy for reliability-based structural optimization [J].
Cheng, Gengdong ;
Xu, Lin ;
Jiang, Lei .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2006, 84 (21) :1353-1367
[9]   Saddlepoint approximation for sequential optimization and reliability analysis [J].
Du, Xiaoping .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2008, 130 (01)
[10]   Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design [J].
Du, XP ;
Chen, W .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2004, 126 (02) :225-233