Classification of Sea Ice Types in ENVISAT Synthetic Aperture Radar Images

被引:135
作者
Zakhvatkina, Natalia Yu [1 ,2 ]
Alexandrov, Vitaly Yu [2 ,3 ]
Johannessen, Ola M. [3 ,4 ]
Sandven, Stein [3 ]
Frolov, Ivan Ye [5 ]
机构
[1] Arctic & Antarctic Res Inst, St Petersburg 199397, Russia
[2] Nansen Int Environm & Remote Sensing Ctr, St Petersburg 199034, Russia
[3] Nansen Environm & Remote Sensing Ctr, N-5006 Bergen, Norway
[4] Univ Bergen, Bergen, Norway
[5] Arctic & Antarctic Res Inst, Dept Ice Regime, St Petersburg 199397, Russia
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2013年 / 51卷 / 05期
关键词
Classification; neural network (NN) algorithm; sea ice; synthetic aperture radar (SAR); NEURAL-NETWORKS; C-BAND; SIGNATURES; FEATURES; SCATTEROMETER; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2012.2212445
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In this paper, sea ice in the Central Arctic has been classified in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images from ENVISAT using a neural network (NN)-based algorithm and a Bayesian algorithm. Since different sea ice types can have similar backscattering coefficients at C-band HH polarization, it is necessary to use textural features in addition to the backscattering coefficients. The analysis revealed that the most informative texture features for the classification of multiyear ice (MYI), deformed first-year ice (FYI) (DFYI), and level FYI (LFYI) and open water/nilas are correlation, inertia, cluster prominence, energy, homogeneity, and entropy, as well as third and fourth central statistical moments of image brightness. The optimal topology of the NN, trained for ENVISAT wide-swath SAR sea ice classification, consists of nine neurons in input layer, six neurons in hidden layer, and three neurons in output layer. The classification results for a series of 20 SAR images, acquired in the central part of the Arctic Ocean during winter months, were compared to expert analysis of the images and ice charts. The results of the NN classification show that the average correspondences with the expert analysis amount to 85%, 83%, and 80% for LFYI, DFYI, and MYI, respectively. The Bayesian pixel-based method can provide a higher resolution in the classified image and, therefore, better capability to identify leads compared to the NN method. Both methods may be effectively used in the Central Arctic where MYI is predominant.
引用
收藏
页码:2587 / 2600
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Abreu R. D., 2000, P WORKSH MAPP ARCH S, P85
[2]  
Alexandrov V. Y., 2008, PROBLEMS ARCTIC ANTA, V1, P90
[3]  
Alexandrov V. Y., 2008, EARTH OBSERVATION SP, P3
[4]   Comparison of sea ice signatures in OKEAN and RADARSAT radar images for the northeastern Barents Sea [J].
Alexandrov, VY ;
Sandven, S ;
Kloster, K ;
Bobylev, LP ;
Zaitsev, LV .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 30 (06) :882-892
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Digital Image Processing
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ANAL SAR DATA POLAR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, 259 WMO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis
[9]  
ASKNE J, 1994, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P162, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.1994.399068
[10]   AN INVESTIGATION OF THE TEXTURAL CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH GRAY-LEVEL COOCCURRENCE MATRIX STATISTICAL PARAMETERS [J].
BARALDI, A ;
PARMIGGIANI, F .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1995, 33 (02) :293-304